My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BZ Packet 06.13.2019
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Board of Zoning
>
BOZA Agendas/Packets
>
2019
>
BZ Packet 06.13.2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2019 10:08:35 AM
Creation date
8/20/2019 10:08:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
6/13/2019
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Board of Zoning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oman Variance <br />Page 3 <br />It is in staff's opinion that there are practical difficulties in meeting the shoreland setback <br />requirements. The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner with <br />adding an addition to the house. The location of the house and property boundaries make it <br />infeasible to meet the shoreland setback requirements of 200 feet. Several buildings on Horseshoe <br />Lake do not meet the shoreland setback requirements and the proposed addition would not alter <br />the character of the area. <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent <br />of this chapter and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />The spirit and intent of the shoreland setback requirement is to keep buildings a reasonable distance <br />from the lakes. The existing house and several houses in the area do not meet the shoreland <br />setback requirements. The proposed building addition is further from the lake than the existing <br />house. The variance request would result in the proposed addition being a reasonable distance <br />from the lake, therefore, would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />(4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br />The addition the house is allowed in the FUS zoning district. <br />(5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum <br />necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued <br />within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br />discharge would result. <br />The property is not located within a FEMA designated floodplain. However, the building addition <br />will be required to meet building code regulations regarding low floor separation from the <br />groundwater elevation. <br />(6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject <br />property is in compliance with city and state codes. <br />The property is served by well and septic systems. Any additional septic system installed must <br />comply with city and state codes. The applicant will be required to get a permit from Washington <br />County for the house addition in relation to septic system compliance. <br />5. CONCLUSION: <br />The applicant is requesting a variance from the Shoreland Overlay District setback requirements <br />to allow an addition on to an existing house. It's in staff's opinion that the applicant meets all the <br />criteria necessary to approve the variance request. <br />6. RECOMMENDATION: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.