My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BZ Packet 08.22.2019
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Board of Zoning
>
BOZA Agendas/Packets
>
2019
>
BZ Packet 08.22.2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2019 10:10:07 AM
Creation date
8/20/2019 10:08:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
8/22/2019
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Board of Zoning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />The building is also centrally located within the site and will not overshadow existing <br />buildings and will not noticeably impact the surrounding development. Unlike other <br />residential developments, the building is further away from adjacent properties and roads. <br />The building is approximately 200 feet from Rosemary Way and approximately 250 feet <br />away from the nearest townhome to the west. <br />The City Multi -Family Design Guidelines have specific design requirements for multi- <br />family buildings. The applicant has done a good job complying with the design guidelines <br />and the proposed building is attractive and blends in with the surrounding area. If the <br />variance is not granted, the building design would change significantly and would likely <br />result in a flat roof building. The residential developments in this area all have pitched <br />roofs and staff recommends the proposed building have a pitch roof to be consistent with <br />the other residential developments in the area. <br />The apartment building is compatible with the master plan, the surrounding development, <br />and will not alter the character of the area. <br />It is in staff's opinion that the applicant has practical difficulties in meeting the zoning <br />requirement. <br />(3)S <br />pirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent <br />of this chapter and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow a certain building height without adversely <br />impacting the character of established areas and ensuring the building is consistent with the <br />surrounding development. The building is centrally located within the site, further away from <br />adjacent properties and roads than most other developments, and will not overshadow existing <br />buildings. The height of the building will not adversely impact the character of the area and will <br />be consistent with the surrounding development. The granting of the variance will keep with the <br />spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />(4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br />An apartment is allowed in the Medium Density Multiple Family Residential (R-5) district with <br />approval of a conditional use permit. The conditional use permit has been approved by the City <br />Council. <br />(5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum <br />necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued <br />within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br />discharge would result. <br />The property is not located within a floodplain designated by FEMA. <br />(6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.