My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019.09.03 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2019 CC Packets
>
2019.09.03 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 1:35:33 PM
Creation date
8/29/2019 4:19:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
9/3/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />of the building being 10 feet taller than what is allowed by ordinance is minimized <br />because of the location of the building and its proximity to the road and other residential <br />development. <br />c. Character o Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the land use for the site as Medium Density <br />Residential (MD). The site is located between a commercial area, large lot residential, <br />and a townhome development. The property is part of the Frenchman Place development <br />that was master planned in 2008. There are several lots in the development that were <br />proposed to be a combination of institutional, residential, and commercial uses. <br />The building is also centrally located within the site and will not overshadow existing <br />buildings and will not noticeably impact the surrounding development. Unlike other <br />residential developments, the building is further away from adjacent properties and roads. <br />The building is approximately 200 feet from Rosemary Way and approximately 250 feet <br />away from the nearest townhome to the west. <br />The City Multi -Family Design Guidelines have specific design requirements for multi- <br />family buildings. The applicant has done a good job complying with the design guidelines <br />and the proposed building is attractive and blends in with the surrounding area. If the <br />variance is not granted, the building design would change significantly and would likely <br />result in a flat roof building. The residential developments in this area all have pitched <br />roofs and staff recommends the proposed building have a pitch roof to be consistent with <br />the other residential developments in the area. <br />The apartment building is compatible with the master plan, the surrounding development, <br />and will not alter the character of the area. <br />It is in staff s opinion that the applicant has practical difficulties in meeting the zoning <br />requirement. <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent <br />of this chapter and with the policies of the City s Comprehensive Plan. <br />The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow a certain building height without adversely <br />impacting the character of established areas and ensuring the building is consistent with the <br />surrounding development. The building is centrally located within the site, further away from <br />adjacent properties and roads than most other developments, and will not overshadow existing <br />buildings. The height of the building will not adversely impact the character of the area and will <br />be consistent with the surrounding development. The granting of the variance will keep with the <br />spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.