My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019.04.17 Parks Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2019
>
2019.04.17 Parks Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 1:57:08 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 10:51:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
4/17/2019
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission <br />Meeting of March 20, 2019 <br />Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm <br />Present: Shawn Haag, Cathy Moore — Arcand, Mat Rauschendorfer, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Ranell <br />Tennyson <br />Absent: Roger Clarke <br />Staff Present: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director <br />Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner <br />Debi Close, Secretary <br />Strub called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. <br />1. Approval of Minutes from the January 16, 2019 Meeting <br />Schmid made a motion, Rauschendorfer seconded to approve the minutes of the January 16, 2019 Parks <br />Commission meeting. <br />Ayes - Mat Rauschendorfer, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Ranell Tennyson <br />Abstained - Shawn Haag, Cathy Moore — Arcand <br />Motion carried. <br />2. The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan <br />Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner, reviewed the sketch plan from Golden Valley Land Company for "The <br />Meadows at Hugo". The sketch plan is for 84 residential lots on 33.41 acres located north of 1591" Street and <br />West of Highway 61. The developer is not proposing to dedicate land and the fee would be $201,600. The <br />developer proposed that the City build a street on the adjacent city -owned property to provide access the <br />development. <br />The Parks Commission discussed that Frog Hollow would serve the park needs of the neighborhood. They <br />also discussed that a future park could go on either city owned property or be built with future development <br />to the north. The Commission generally agreed that payment of a park dedication fee was preferred over <br />dedication of land and trying to locate a small park in this development. In regards to the city -owned <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.