Laserfiche WebLink
1990 2000 2010 2015 <br />Less than HS 11%5%2%3% <br />High School 41%32%25%22% <br />Some College 16%29%24%21% <br />Associates 11%10%13%16% <br />Bachelors 15%17%28%26% <br />Grad / Prof 5%8%9%11% <br />0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%Pct of PopulationEducational Attainment in Hugo <br />1990-2015 <br />Source: 2010 U.S. Census Bureau <br />1990 2000 2010 2015 <br />Hugo 3�12 2�99 2�67 2�65 <br />Washington County 2�92 2�78 2�67 2�67 <br />TC Region 2�56 2�53 2�5 2�5 <br />2 <br />2�2 <br />2�4 <br />2�6 <br />2�8 <br />3 <br />3�2 <br />Number of PeopleAverage household Size in Hugo (1990-2015) <br />Source: 2010 U.S. Dicennial Census, ACS Census, Metropolitan Council <br />Figure 2-3 Figure 2-4 Figure 2-5 4922698471141521,6959781,5353084741,6571,0841,5203465700 <br />200 <br />400 <br />600 <br />800 <br />1,000 <br />1,200 <br />1,400 <br />1,600 <br />1,800 <br />Families without <br />children <br />Lived alone Married families <br />with children <br />Non-family <br />households <br />Unmarried <br />families with <br />childrenNumber of PeopleHousehold Type in Hugo <br />2000 2010 2015 <br />Source: 2010 U.S. Census Bureau <br />18COMMUNITY BACKGROUND2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE <br />DRAFT Dec14-17 <br />for review only <br />DRAFT Dec14-17 <br />for review only <br />Educational Attainment <br />While higher levels of educational attainment among residents in Hugo <br />continues to increase, the data shows that after 20 years of decline <br />of residents with less than a high school degree, there was a slight <br />increase in the percent of people in the City that had less than a high <br />school degree� Hugo continues to see increases in the number of <br />residents who have an associates or a graduate / professional degree� <br />The City will continue to monitor educational attainment to see if the <br />changing numbers indicate long-term trends that have the potential to <br />impact services� <br />Household Size and Type <br />Household in Hugo declined dramatically from an average of 3�12 <br />people per household in 1990 to an average of 2�65 in 2010, and is <br />holding relatively steady from 2010-2015� The reduction in the average <br />number of people living in a household is similar to county-wide <br />household size trends, which brings it closer to the regional household <br />size overall� As shown in Figure xx, the data suggests that the number <br />of people living alone continues to increase as well as unmarried <br />families with children� These trends indicate that housing needs may <br />be different for residents that live alone, families with children and <br />families without children�