My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.12.20 Parks Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2017
>
2017.12.20 Parks Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2019 12:00:47 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 11:04:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
12/20/2017
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
73LAND USE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE <br />DRAFT Dec14-17 <br />for review only <br />DRAFT Dec14-17 <br />for review only <br />DRAFT Dec14-17 <br />for review only <br />DRAFT Dec14-17 <br />for review only <br />Site Planning Techniques for Transitions <br />There is also a need for transitions between land uses on a site <br />planning level� Site planning techniques for transitions usually take <br />the form of berms, fences, vegetative screening, and landscaped <br />buffer yards� While these techniques can provide a smooth transition <br />between uses, they are often used by communities to create a wall <br />that completely separates adjacent land uses� This is not the objective <br />of a good site level transition� Rather, a site level transition should be <br />just that, a passage from one land use to another� <br />Site Planning techniques for transitions include: <br />• Site layout-requiring separation of active areas from sensitive <br />uses (Figure 3-5)� The active areas, such as a truck loading <br />area, parking lots or major site entrances, should be placed <br />away from areas such as private residential yards� <br />• Architectural design� Requiring design that is complementary in <br />height, scale, massing, materials, roof lines, door and window <br />placement and overall appearance to adjacent buildings� <br />Figure 3-6 illustrates a retail center adjacent to a single- <br />family neighborhood� The center is similar in height to the <br />adjacent homes, has pitched roofs that are typically associated <br />with residential construction and has a staggered building line <br />to break up the mass of the building to give the appearance of <br />less bulk� <br />• Building orientation� Requiring that different uses abut at <br />side or rear yards rather than facing each other across <br />front yards� Figure 3-7 illustrates how this could work with <br />single-family homes and townhomes. The first sketch <br />also illustrates how garage placement can act as a further <br />buffer� Buildings should be placed back to back, but not <br />back to front� <br />Figure 3-5 Figure 3-6 Figure 3-7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.