My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020.03.16 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2020 CC Packets
>
2020.03.16 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 12:54:57 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:26:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/16/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3/12/2020 Neighbors weigh in on new public works facility I News I presspubs.com <br />In 2019, the council approved a facility needs study for the Public Works Department and approved <br />the 2020 budget, which allows for either the expansion or relocation of the public works facility, <br />currently located at 6900 137th Street N., just west of Hanifl Fields Athletic Park. The first part of the <br />study dived into what it would take to accommodate the department's needs by expanding its <br />current facility. The second part of the study investigated the construction of a brand new facility on <br />approximately 10-15 acres of the 125-acre site. <br />Public Works Director Scott Anderson said, "Expansion of our building (on the current site)does not <br />allow for long-term expansion beyond 15 years. We would reach capacity with no further expansion <br />available." The study concluded that it would be more cost effective and better fit the department's <br />long-term needs to build a new facility at Irish Avenue Park. <br />Many residents shared their concerns and expressed that the reason they moved to Hugo in the first <br />place was for its country feel. One resident said, "We have lived in the area for 10 years and we love <br />it. It is dark at night, quiet and there are no artificial lights shining into the sky." <br />A common concern among residents was the lighting that would be used on a new facility. <br />City staff and the council explained that both advances in lighting and the city's standards for lighting <br />have come a long way since the original facility was built in 2004. <br />One resident said, "A handful of people in this room moved out here because we like the peaceful <br />nature of the property, so people are sensitive to it becoming industrialized. Take into consideration <br />what you would want to live next to, especially since this is an agricultural area. We didn't move to a <br />house in a development on a cul-de-sac," he said. <br />Another resident wanted to know what would be done with the existing building if a new one was <br />constructed. Bear said they don't know the answer to that yet for sure, but they have some ideas. <br />He said the city has had discussions with White Bear Lake Area Schools, which needs a grounds <br />maintenance facility. Another possibility might be for the county to use the space. <br />A concern was the noise and traffic that might be generated from the site. Anderson explained, "We <br />are pretty good neighbors. It is quiet on the evenings and weekends." He added that public works <br />staff are good about doing what they can before a snowfall so when they come in early in the <br />morning to begin plowing, "alarms aren't going off and tailgates aren't banging." <br />https://www.presspubs.com/citizen/news/neighbors-weigh-in-on-new-public-works-facility/article_1 e2b4292-6491-1 l ea-84f1-ff91 ab89c221.htrnl 315 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.