My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020.08.03 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2020 CC Packets
>
2020.08.03 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2020 9:04:28 AM
Creation date
7/31/2020 9:03:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN <br />CITY OF HUGO <br />WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 3 <br />C. Development and Redevelopment Projects <br /> <br />The intent of the volume credits for development and redevelopment projects is to use credits <br />when site specific limitations are present and/or where regional reuse projects have been <br />constructed. Site specific limitations include but are not limited to: potential contamination, <br />physical limitations, and land use limitations (see Table 1). Based on the Credit Valuation Guide <br />in Appendix B, one volume credit (one acre-foot of irrigation annually) will sufficiently provide <br />stormwater volume control for 0.589 acres of impervious area for private development projects. <br />Development projects that purchase volume credits must still demonstrate compliance with all <br />other RCWD and City of Hugo rules, including rate control requirements. The applicant must <br />follow the City’s stormwater sequencing flow chart to determine if purchasing credits is an option <br />for the site (Appendix C). Priority will be placed on purchasing credits generated from a regional <br />reuse system downstream that intercepts the runoff volume leaving the project site prior to the <br />ROC and any other natural waters (ie, streams and wetlands). If that is not possible, then it will <br />need to be demonstrated that the runoff leaving the site will not cause negative water quality <br />impacts on any downstream natural waters and/or the ROC. This could be done through water <br />quality modeling. <br /> <br />Table 1: Potential Site Specific Limitations <br />Type Specific Project Site Conditions Required Submittals <br />Potential <br />Contamination <br />Potential Stormwater Hotspots (PSH) PSH Locations and Flow Paths <br />Contaminated Soils Documentation of Contamination <br />Soil Borings <br />Physical Limitations <br />Low Permeability Soils *HSG C & D) Soil Borings <br />Bedrock within three vertical feet of <br />bottom of infiltration area Soil Borings <br />Seasonal high water table within three <br />vertical feet of bottom of infiltration area <br />Soils Borings <br />High Water Table <br />Karst areas Soil Borings <br />Land Use Limitations Utility Locations Site Map <br />Nearby Wells (Private and/or Municipal) Well Locations <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.