My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020.08.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2020 CC Packets
>
2020.08.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 1:00:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2020 12:57:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/17/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo Gardens Page 2 <br /> facility and four outlots: Outlot A was dedicated as public park, Outlot B and C were planned for future development and Outlot D was planned for stormwater management. The current project includes development of Outlot B and construction of stormwater ponding on Outlot D. <br />3. ANALYSIS: <br />A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUD amendments. A PUD must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. <br />B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Final Plat The applicant has submitted a final plat to replat Outlot B as Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, Hugo Gardens. There are a number of items that the developer and staff are continuing to work to resolve, but we have addressed those outstanding items in the approval conditions. Approval is subject to approval of the easement vacation and approval of the development agreement. <br />C. Conclusions <br /> Staff reviewed the final plat against City standards and the original PUD approvals and finds that the proposed project generally conforms. However, there are a number of outstanding issues that must be clarified, and conditions that must be met by the applicant to ensure compliance with City standards. Staff believes that these issues can be addressed through the conditions in the draft resolution regarding those items. <br />4. RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt the Resolution Approving the Final Plat <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS: a. Resolution Approving the Final Plat b. Draft Development Agreement c. Engineer’s Memo, dated October 18, 2018 d. Civil Plans received on July 24, 2020 e. Landscape plans received on August 10, 2020 f. Final Plat received on July 24, 2020
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.