My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020.08.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2020 CC Packets
>
2020.08.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 1:00:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2020 12:57:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/17/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oman Variance, 6900 170th Street North <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Accessory buildings are common within this area and are allowed in the FUS zoning <br />district. Many of the homes around Horseshoe Lake are legal nonconforming and do not <br />meet shoreland requirements. The proposed accessory building size is permitted by City <br />Code and the proposed setback variance would not noticeably alter the character of the <br />area. <br /> <br />It is in staff’s opinion that there are practical difficulties in meeting the shoreland setback <br />requirements. The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner by <br />constructing an accessory building. The location of the home, well, septic system, and property <br />boundaries make it impractical to meet the shoreland setback requirements of 200 feet. Several <br />buildings on Horseshoe Lake do not meet the shoreland setback requirements and the proposed <br />accessory building would not alter the character of the area. <br /> <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The spirit and intent of the shoreland setback requirement is to keep buildings a reasonable <br />distance from the lakes. The existing house and several houses in the area do not meet the <br />shoreland setback requirements. The proposed accessory building is further from the lake than <br />the existing house. The variance request would result in the proposed accessory building being a <br />reasonable distance from the lake, therefore, would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> (4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br />Accessory buildings are allowed in the FUS zoning district. <br />(5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum <br />necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued <br />within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br />discharge would result. <br />The property is not located within a FEMA designated floodplain. However, the building <br />addition will be required to meet building code regulations regarding low floor separation from <br />the groundwater elevation. <br />(6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject <br />property is in compliance with city and state codes. <br /> <br />The property is served by well and septic systems. Any additional septic system installed must <br />comply with city and state codes. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.