Laserfiche WebLink
Project Name and/or Number: 2021 Downtown Improvements 015887-000 <br />Attachment C <br />Avoidance and Minimization <br />Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a <br />description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management, <br />and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings, <br />roads, etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management <br />plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary: <br />The purpose of this project is to improve the mobility of traffic and pedestrians through downtown Hugo by providing local <br />road connections. As part of this improvement, an extension of 147th Street to connect Oneka Parkway providing a direct <br />connection of Oneka Parkway with downtown Hugo. <br />The need of this project is to provide a safe and direct connection to downtown Hugo. The current option for travel between <br />Oneka Parkway and downtown Hugo involves motorists and pedestrians having to access heavily travelled Frenchman Road <br />and Highway 61. Extending 147th Street west to Oneka Parkway will allow local traffic and pedestrians to bypass these <br />roadways, creating a safer and more direct connection. An 8-foot trail is also proposed on the north side of 147th Street. This <br />trail will provide safer pedestrian travels. <br />Requirements: The 147th Street extension is being designed to meet State Aid standards. 147th Street will be constructed with <br />11.5-foot lanes from center line to curb and gutter. The trail will be 8 feet wide with 2-foot clear zones on each side. <br />Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist. <br />Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives <br />that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or <br />not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged <br />to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis: <br />No Build: The first alternative that was reviewed to avoid wetland impacts was the no build option. This alternative would <br />consist of not completing the project. It would also not create connection between Oneka Parkway and Downtown Hugo. The <br />no build alternative did not meet the purpose or needs of the project and was rejected. <br />Downtown Improvements: This alternative would reconstruct downtown Hugo but would not include the 147th Street <br />extension. This alternative would not create the connection from Oneka Parkway to Downtown Hugo as identified within <br />Hugo’s Comprehensive Plan. Based on not meeting the purpose of the project to create a connection this alternative was <br />rejected. <br />Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest <br />extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water <br />resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4): <br />Wetland impacts were minimized by following an existing gravel service road in a northwest direct from the newly proposed <br />intersection of Finale Ave. This alignment prevents 147th Street from going directly west, following the current alignment of <br />147th Street. Utilizing the existing service road alignment reduces wetland impacts by approximately 1.06 acres. <br />Along with the chosen alignment the proposed trail was designed to minimum state aid standards of 8 feet wide instead of the <br />recommended 10 feet wide, thus reducing wetland impacts. <br />Off-Site Alternatives. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal <br />will require an individual permit (standard permit or letter of permission) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you may be <br />required to provide an off-site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must <br />be provided during the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final <br />decision. Applicants with questions about when an off-site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project <br />Manager. <br />NA