Laserfiche WebLink
developed to the maximum permissible density indicated in any governing planning document or <br />ordinance or amendments thereto. <br />e. Inconsistency with comprehensive plan. Subdivisions and property line adjustments that do not <br />follow planned public improvement corridors or that do not constitute an infilling of <br />development shall be deemed inconsistent with the city's growth strategies as outlined in the <br />comprehensive plan. <br />City service capacity. A proposed subdivision or property line adjustment shall be determined to <br />lack necessary city service capacity when services such as recreational facilities, police and fire <br />protection, and other city services, which must be provided at public expense, cannot reasonably <br />be provided for within the next two years. <br />g. Inconsistency with capital improvement plans. A proposed subdivision or property line <br />adjustment shall be deemed inconsistent with capital improvement plans when improvements <br />and/or services necessary to accommodate the proposed subdivision have not been <br />programmed in applicable capital improvement plans. The city council may waive this criterion <br />when it can be demonstrated that a revision to capital improvement programs can be <br />accommodated. <br />(2) Burden of establishing adequacy. The burden shall be upon the applicant to show that the proposed <br />subdivision er--development, or and property line adjustment -has adequate public facilities and is not <br />premature. <br />(Prior Code, § 1215-085.1) <br />(Supp. No. 28) <br />Created: 2021-07-21 11:43:5S [EST] <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />