My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BZ Packet 08.13.20
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Board of Zoning
>
BOZA Agendas/Packets
>
2020
>
BZ Packet 08.13.20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2022 3:29:25 PM
Creation date
1/3/2022 3:28:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
8/13/2020
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Board of Zoning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Schuman Variance <br />B. Setback Requirement Variance <br />The Shoreland Overlay District requires a structure setback of 200 feet from the OHW mark of <br />Horseshoe Lake however, the Minnesota DNR requires a 150 feet setback. The deck is proposed <br />to be setback approximately 90 feet from the OHW mark of Horseshoe Lake. <br />4. VARIANCE STANDARDS: <br />The Board must review the requested variances with the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of <br />the land use regulations. Staff used these standards to review the variance request and finds the <br />following: <br />(1) Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. <br />The proposed variance is permissible by law. <br />(2) Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term "Practical <br />Difficulties" as used in the granting of a variance means: <br />a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable <br />manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and, <br />By constructing a deck on the property, the applicant is proposing to use the property in a <br />reasonable manner. No part of the property meets the shoreland setback requirements, <br />therefore making a variance request necessary for any construction on the property. It is <br />in staff s opinion that it is reasonable to request a deck to be built on the property. <br />b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique <br />to the property not created by the landowner and, <br />The property is unique in that the existing home on site is legal nonconforming to the <br />shoreland setback requirements. The proposed detached deck is positioned to meet <br />setback requirements from the existing well. Additionally, the surrounding properties also <br />have buildings and accessory structures within similar distances to the OHW mark. <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />Accessory structures are common within this area and are allowed in the FUS zoning <br />district. Many of the homes around Horseshoe Lake are legal nonconforming and do not <br />meet shoreland requirements. According to the DNR regulations, water oriented <br />accessory structures are permitted within the shoreland district and are allowed to be as <br />close as 10 feet from the OHW mark. Decks are considered a water oriented structure if <br />they are 250 square feet or smaller. Because the proposed deck is greater than 250 square <br />feet, a variance is required. <br />N <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.