Laserfiche WebLink
RE: Oneka Lake Reserve <br />June 5, 2020 <br />Criteria (2) The mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not <br />otherwise be accomplished under this chapter. <br />Response: The project does not include a mixture of land uses but does provide a variant of <br />townhome that does not presently exist in the area. The townhomes to the east and south east are <br />back to back townhomes with 4 units per building. The townhomes to the south are single loaded <br />similar to the buildings proposed for this neighborhood but they are split entry units most suitable <br />for younger homeowners. The homes proposed for this neighborhood provide a main level master <br />bedroom desired by many buyers, especially older residents. <br />Criteria (3) Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to improve <br />site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements (e.g., construction <br />materials, landscaping, lighting, open space, etc.) that exceed the city's standards to offset the effect of any <br />variations. <br />Response: The proposed development includes a neighborhood park designed to serve younger <br />children that either live in the area or that are visiting grandparents. The park land itself is intended <br />to fulfill park dedication requirements. The developer proposes to construct the improvements <br />shown on the landscape plan at their cost as part of the PUD. These improvements include a paved <br />trike track/walking path, playground, picnic tables and gazebo. <br />In addition to the park the developer plans an attractive landscape that exceeds city requirements. <br />The development's density would drop precipitously if it was necessary to provide a public right of <br />way and standard setbacks. At the proposed density the cost of land and infrastructure is spread <br />over more units improving affordability. <br />Criteria (4) A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time <br />protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of <br />the city. <br />Response: The project has been designed with a private street system that will be maintained by a <br />homeowners associates thus saving city tax payers that expense. The narrower than typical streets <br />with designated parallel bays will help calm traffic. By reducing the building setback it is feasible to <br />loop the street on this relatively narrow site, thereby providing alternative routes in an emergency <br />situation. <br />Criteria (5) Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not limited to <br />the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, <br />reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. <br />Response: The site is generally void of natural features. The quality trees planted in the southwest <br />corner of the site will be preserved within the park. The proposed stormwater management plan <br />expands and joins the ponds in two neighboring developments improving the aesthetics and <br />creating additional wildlife habitat. <br />Criteria (6) Maintenance or improvement for the efficiency of public streets and utilities. <br />Response: The creation of a private street system reduces public expenditures per capita for <br />maintenance. The utilities are proposed to be publicly owned and maintained. <br />Page 4of6 <br />Z!�4-�h <br />❑ E 9 1 G N <br />