My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Parks Packet 03.17.21
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2021
>
Parks Packet 03.17.21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2022 8:57:18 AM
Creation date
1/5/2022 8:55:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/17/2021
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vehicular access off of Homestead Drive and 125th Street, and internal trails. Amberg stated that there has <br />not been a traffic study done and the plans are still conceptual. Concept Two also shows a fishing pier and <br />boulder outcroppings along the shoreline. <br />Chair Strub stated that the Parks Commission would like to take comments from the residents on the <br />potential park's design and emphasized that the funding and economics of the park is something that will be <br />discussed at a later date. Strub invited residents to come forward. <br />Many residents addressed the Parks Commission and provided thoughts and feedback on the general design <br />of the park. Popular topics that came up were the maintenance of the park, the potential park users, the <br />ecology of Sunset Lake, and the number of parking spaces shown on the concept plans. Residents were <br />generally worried about increased traffic in their neighborhood and on the lake. Comments included: <br />• There are too many parking spaces shown in the park and the number of spaces should be reduced <br />to two to five. <br />• Where would residents be able to put their lake weeds? <br />• There was a concern that property values would decrease with the park. <br />• One resident asked the City to pay association fees and to be responsible for restocking the lake. <br />• There was concern with how many trucks would drive on the lake during winter. <br />• Residents were concerned with the hours of the park and it was mentioned that the park should not <br />be open past daylight hours. <br />• How would the City manage loitering in the park? <br />• A few residents stated that they did not want access from Homestead Avenue North. <br />• One resident stated that access from 125th Street North is dangerous. <br />• Some residents want a toilet on site, some did not. <br />• Some residents were okay with a picnic table, but not a shelter. Others did not want either on site. <br />• One resident stated that the plans looked really nice, but is worried the park would be too <br />manicured. <br />• Some residents would prefer that there be no lights or electricity on site. <br />• Could there be access to other lakes like Oneka Lake or Egg Lake? <br />The Commissioners and staff answered the residents and their concerns and provided additional details on <br />how parks are developed in the City of Hugo. Commissioner Clarke made a statement that one of the Parks <br />Commission's role is to respond the needs of the community as a whole. Of the 30+ residents in attendance <br />at the meeting, 13 residents came forward to voice their opinions. The Parks Commission understood that <br />many residents were not in support of the concept plans presented. <br />The Parks Commission directed staff to tone down the concept plans. <br />3. Adjournment <br />Schmid made a motion, Clarke seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 pm. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.