My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022.02.07 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2022 CC Packets
>
2022.02.07 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2022 1:46:35 PM
Creation date
2/4/2022 1:45:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/7/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kruse Variance <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br />The property is a vacant parcel and a lot of record. The property owner would like to be <br />able to build a home on the property. Single family homes are allowed in the Rural <br />Residential (RR) zoning district. <br /> <br />b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique <br />to the property not created by the landowner and; <br /> <br />The property is unique because it narrow and sits tightly between Sunset Lake and Ingersoll <br />Avenue North. The strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship <br />because the property owner would not have a reasonably sized building area for a new <br />home without the granting of variances. <br /> <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />Several homes in the area do not meet the shoreland setback requirements. The building <br />is proposed to in line with the other homes in the area. The proposed variance requests <br />would not change the overall character of the area. <br />It’s in staff opinion that there are practical difficulties in meeting the shoreland setback <br />requirements. If the applicant were to meet the shoreland setbacks, there would not be a building <br />area for a home. The proposed building area related to the proposed setbacks will fit in with the <br />other homes on the neighborhood. <br /> <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br />The spirit and intent of the shoreland setback requirement is to keep buildings a reasonable <br />distance from the lakes. Several homes in the area do not meet the shoreland setback <br />requirements. The variance requests would not change the overall character of the area, <br />therefore, would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />(4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br /> <br />The construction of a house is allowed in the RR zoning district. <br /> (5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum <br />necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued <br />within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br />discharge would result. <br />A portion of the property is located within a FEMA designated floodplain. The proposed house <br />will not be located in this area. The lowest floor of the house is required to be 3 feet above the <br />floodplain elevation. The proposed lowest floor elevation of the house meets this standard.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.