My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022.03.07 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2022 CC Packets
>
2022.03.07 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2022 8:46:48 AM
Creation date
3/4/2022 8:44:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/7/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Central Region Headquarters <br />1200 Warner Road <br />Saint Paul, MN 55106 <br />February 17, 2022 <br />Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant <br />City of Hugo <br />14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North <br />Hugo, MN 55038 <br /> <br />Re: Tennyson Variance Application, 12582 Ingersoll Avenue, Hugo <br />Dear Emily Weber, <br />Thank you for notifying DNR of the upcoming hearing to discuss the Tennyson variance application for the property at <br />12582 Ingersoll Avenue North in Hugo. <br />In the course of reviewing the applicant’s request for a variance to allow an accessory structure to be built 6.9 feet from <br />the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of Sunset Lake, I observed a 2021 aerial photo in Google Maps that appears to <br />show intensive removal of trees along the property’s shoreline. When compared to aerial photos from 2020 in the <br />Washington County Property Viewer, it’s apparent that the removal has resulted in a substantial reduction in shading of <br />the lake water surface and in screening of the garage as viewed from the water during summer, leaf-on conditions. The <br />vegetation removal appears to be inconsistent with Sec. 90-181(i) of the city’s code and the state’s shoreland <br />management standards. In addition to screening structures and providing shade, I note that shoreline vegetation is <br />critical for preventing erosion and stabilizing shorelines. <br />Please see the attached DNR’s guidance document on variances from OHWL setback standards in shoreland. Should the <br />city determine that the factual findings support granting the variance, I recommend the city impose conditions requiring <br />establishment of shoreline vegetation to restore screening of the accessory structure as viewed from the water. DNR’s <br />Maintaining and Restoring Natural Shorelines webpage is a useful resource. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Dan Scollan <br />East Metro Area Hydrologist <br /> <br />cc: Dan Petrik, DNR Lake & River Shoreland Program Manager <br /> John (Jack) Gleason, DNR South District Hydrologist Supervisor <br /> <br />Attachments: <br /> Shoreland & Floodplain Variance Guidance Series – OHWL Setbacks
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.