Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 2, 2022 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br /> <br />Rebecca Haug from WSB talked about wetland banking saying it was part of the Clean Water <br />Act Program to achieve a no-net loss. She reviewed rules of MN wetland banking as overseen <br />by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. She explained wetland banking is based <br />on market demand and the cost is negotiable. She showed the ten Wetland Bank Service Area <br />saying Hugo was in Service Area Number 7. She talked about the formula for selling credits. <br />Credits must be purchased in the same watershed as the affected wetland. <br /> <br />She talked about a proposed North Star Wetland Bank explaining there was a potential of 51.67 <br />acres of credits. Banks retore native vegetation, and there is a new state program that allowed <br />plants to be removed and replanted in the banks. It also creates educational opportunities and <br />recreational space. She said it would be a great financial incentive as a non-tax revenue source, <br />and funding could be used in any way the City decided. She talked about the City of Blaine’s <br />program with their revenue being used mostly on economic development and funding of trails <br />and open space. <br /> <br />Rebecca explained the return on investment is 3-5 years. At the current market rate, 51.67 acres <br />would be a net $4.2 million. The estimated total cost would be $970,000 with the biggest cost <br />being construction at $815,000. She explained it would be a three-year process, and the next <br />steps would be to work with the school district and do hydrology and vegetation monitoring. <br />Based on that data, a draft prospectus would be completed. WSB estimated it would cost $14,500 <br />the first year. The following year would cost an estimated $120,000 for submittal of the Wetland <br />Banking Plan and Mitigation Banking Instrument. Meetings would be held with the public and <br />stakeholders, and a perpetual conservation easement would be established over the project area. <br />The work would be done the third year and likely be a winter project. After release, 15% of the <br />credit would be available. Depending on performance, all of it should be available after five <br />years. Maintenance would need to be done at an estimated cost of $820,000. She said there <br />were grant opportunities through LCCMR and Safe Routes to School. <br /> <br />Petryk asked if the City needed to bond to ensure there would be on-going maintenance. Haug <br />said, as part of the plan, the bank would be stopped if not maintained. <br /> <br />Klein asked who would own the property after the credits were sold, and he asked about draining <br />the wetland. Haug responded that the ownership would not change, and Bear responded that the <br />drainage would fit into the City’s wetland plan. <br /> <br />Strub made motion, Miron seconded, proceeded allocating funds for Phase 1 at an estimated cost <br />of $14,500. <br /> <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Schedule Annual Performance Review for City Administrator Bryan Bear <br /> <br />Bryan Bear has been employed with the City since May 3, 2004, and served as the Community <br />Development Director until being appointed as the City Administrator on November, 7, 2011. <br />Staff requested Council schedule the annual performance review for City Administrator Bryan <br />Bear. <br /> <br /> <br />