My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022.10.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2022 CC Packets
>
2022.10.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2022 2:55:58 PM
Creation date
11/3/2022 2:50:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
10/17/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Hugo <br />9/6/2022 <br />Page 4 <br />Recommendations for Rehabilitation: <br /> <br />Based on the conditions of the existing bituminous and subsurface data gathered by WSB, we <br />are recommending the reconstruction technique below be considered. <br />Pavement thicknesses do not allow for a mill and overlay option due to shallow pavement depths. <br />We recommend full depth pavement removal and replacement. This would entail of the complete <br />removal and disposal of the existing bituminous pavements. The underlying base should be <br />compacted, shaped and proof rolled immediately prior to bituminous paving. <br />In general, existing aggregate base appeared to be finer than typical requirements for MnDOT <br />Class 5 aggregate base. Additional clean coarse gravel could be added and blended in to existing <br />aggregate base. <br />The deciding factor between these possible options may be largely dependent on the price <br />differences at the time of bidding, project timelines and contractor availability. We would expect <br />both options presented will provide a long-term solution with similar maintenance requirements <br />and total life expectancies. <br />Key Considerations: <br />The import or export of any excess base aggregates associated with the recommended <br />rehabilitation techniques should be considered. The quantity will be highly dependent on <br />designed profiles and structure limitations such as utility structures and any adjacent curb/gutter <br />or driveway tie in elevations. <br />Any unstable base soils discovered during a proofroll would likely require sub cutting and <br />replacement. Potential costs associated with these corrections should be anticipated. <br /> <br />Pavement Design: <br />The new bituminous pavement section and mix type should be designed and specified by a Civil <br />Engineer in consideration of the loads, climate, desired life expectancy and other key factors. <br />Limitations: <br />The field data presented should be considered approximate and only valid for the location <br />investigated. We have assumed smooth transitions of the similar materials between locations <br />when formulating the recommendations provided. <br /> <br />Our recommendations are based solely on the data obtained through our limited field <br />investigations and our experience with similar reconstructive and rehabilitation work for the locale. <br />We consider local contractor experience and industry costs associated with the various <br />rehabilitation techniques available in conjunction with project specific details. <br /> <br />Appendix: <br />• Photographs of Cores <br />• Photographs of Existing Surface Conditio
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.