My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022.08.31 CC Minutes - Midyear Budget Review
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2022 CC Minutes
>
2022.08.31 CC Minutes - Midyear Budget Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2023 12:51:28 PM
Creation date
4/18/2023 12:44:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
8/31/2022
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for August 31, 2022, Midyear Budget Review <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Wobse reviewed the General Fund Budget that included personnel. There were 27 regular full- <br />time employees included in the budget, one vacant position in the Community Development <br />Department, a new deputy clerk position, and funding to allow for the restructuring of the Public <br />Works Department for lead worker positions and a superintendent. A salary survey showed the <br />City of Hugo’s pay was comparable to other metro cities. The proposed budget contained a 4.5% <br />cost of living adjustment. The budget also contained funds to increase the Fire Department <br />retention program to an hourly rate increase of $1 instead of $.50 for firefighters working between <br />5-10 years. Health insurance only increased by 2.15%, and HealthPartners was not increasing the <br />deductible. In summary, the 2023 General Fund Budget was up $1,116,240. In addition to <br />personnel costs, there were increased operating expenses anticipated for Lions Volunteer Park; <br />website redesign, room rental and planning software; and $200,000 for flat tax rate stabilization. <br /> <br />Wobse reviewed how revenues were conservatively estimated. Non-tax levy revenues equaled <br />$729,369. The general fund tax levy requirement after subtracting the non-tax revenues was <br />$7,934,054. In summary, when adding all levies, the total proposed levy came to $10,984,174. <br />Wobse provided fiscal disparities distribution information explaining how the City received more <br />back in volume than contributed. Almost 8.5% of the total tax levy was paid for by this program. <br />At the proposed urban tax rate of 36.274% in 2023, the median valued home would see an <br />increase of $156. This rate would be midrange of other cities in Washington County. A new <br />requirement of the state was to include an insert in the proposed tax notices that would show <br />various levies and budget details. <br /> <br />Wobse asked for a discussion on a fulltime fire chief saying the budget did not contain funding, <br />but if the Council chose to add it, it would reduce the equipment levy to cover salary and benefit <br />costs. She asked for direction on this and on the public works restructuring. <br /> <br />Council had questions on the insert that would accompany the proposed tax notices. Wobse <br />explained the categories would likely model what is submitted to the state auditor. Bear stated the <br />mailing will likely influence what the residents think, and it will be interesting to see the <br />feedback. It was noted it would put emphasis on levies and not values, and other units of <br />government would be reflected as well, not including the state. <br /> <br />There was discussion on the levy increase of $1.3 million over last year. Wobse talked about the <br />increase in the equipment levy and inflation affecting the general fund. There was a question on <br />how Lions Park affected the levy. Wobse explained the park budget increased to $884,000 from <br />$710,000 partially due to added operating expenses for Lions Volunteer Park and additional <br />seasonal worker. It was noted that the park costs may be offset by rental revenues. <br /> <br />There were questions on the City’s reserves and its impact on the borrowing rate. Bear explained <br />having a high balance helps the bond rating. There were other techniques available to achieve the <br />AAA rating, but it was not on the City’s list to borrow money. It was agreed it was a good idea to <br />have the reserves since it was unknown whether the fiscal disparities program may go away. <br /> <br />The Council had questions on the impacts of restructuring Public Works. Wobse replied there <br />would be an impact to the streets fund, parks fund, and the sewer and water fund. It was noted <br />funds were set aside in the previous year’s budget and not used. The organizational chart had <br />been modified, and Council indicated they were comfortable moving forward with restructuring.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.