My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023.11.06 Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2023 CC Packets
>
2023.11.06 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2023 4:00:50 PM
Creation date
11/16/2023 3:59:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
11/6/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Smith Variance and Encroachment Agreement – 12033 Everton Avenue North <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br /> 2 <br />within the right-of-way until such time that approved improvements are made within the right- <br />of-way. The fence is currently located in the applicants back yard, and extends into the right-of- <br />way by a distance of roughly 30 feet. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the <br />location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. <br /> <br />3. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: <br /> <br />The City’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the <br />proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a <br />higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show <br />that they meet the standards in the ordinance. <br /> <br />4. ANALYSIS: <br /> <br />A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning <br /> <br />The surrounding properties are zoned Large Lot Single Family Residential (R-1) and are <br />classified as Very Low Density (VLD) in the 2040 Land Use Plan. The surrounding properties <br />range from 0.25 to 1.36 acres in size and are occupied by single family homes. <br /> <br />5. VARIANCE STANDARDS: <br /> <br />The Board must review the requested variances with the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of <br />the land use regulations. Staff used these standards to review the variance request and finds the <br />following: <br /> <br />(1) Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. <br /> <br />The proposed variance is permissible by law. <br /> <br />(2) Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term “Practical <br />Difficulties” as used in the granting of a variance means: <br /> <br />a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable <br />manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and; <br /> <br />Accessory buildings are allowed in the R-1 zoning district. Lots in the R-1 zoning district <br />that are less than three acres in size are allowed two accessory buildings with a maximum <br />combined size of 1,500 square feet. The applicant is requesting to construct a 1,200 <br />square foot accessory building. There is an existing 197.64 square foot accessory building <br />on site. The square footage of the proposed accessory building along with the existing <br />accessory building will be below the maximum of 1,500 square feet. There are existing <br />trees in the front yard of the property that would provide screening from Everton Avenue <br />North. The request is a reasonable use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.