My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC 09.22.22
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2022 PC Minutes
>
PC 09.22.22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2024 11:48:58 AM
Creation date
3/21/2024 10:05:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/22/2022
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 22, 2022 PC Minutes <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The surrounding properties on the other three corners of the intersection are all zoned C-1 and <br />occupied by commercial uses. Surrounding properties in the neighborhood to the north and south are <br />primarily zoned FCB and occupied by residential uses. This property and surrounding pr operties are <br />guided Mixed-Use (MIX) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, allowing for a mix of residential, commercial, <br />office, retail, and public/quasi-public uses. The property is currently vacant, flat, and does not appear <br />to have wetlands. The property is landscaped with several overhead deciduous trees and lines of <br />coniferous trees providing screening from the property to the north. <br />On April 28, 2022, the Planning Commission gave informal comments on the applicant’s Sketch Plan, <br />agreeing with staff that a neighborhood meeting should be held with the property owners to provide <br />background on the FCB zoning district and how the area may develop. At the neighborhood meeting <br />held on June 9, 2022, neighbors who were concerned about the guidance of their neighborhood asked <br />what could be done to prevent future commercial uses in the area, and staff stated that a petition <br />could be made to consider rezoning the area to a residential district. Staff had not received a petition <br />to the date of this meeting of the Planning Commission. <br />The applicant is requesting to rezone the property from Future Central Business (FCB) to Central <br />Business (C-1). Staff has analyzed this rezoning based on the four criteria in the City ordinance under <br />Section 90-40, Zoning Amendments. The primary factors in Staff’s analysis of the four criteria were the <br />fact that the FCB zoning is designed to allow for future rezoning to C -1, and that the applicant had <br />worked closely with staff to design the project with minimal impacts on neighboring residen tial <br />properties. Staff found that all of the necessary requirements for approval of a zoning amendment <br />were met. <br />The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a drive -through lane to be <br />within 200 feet of a residentially-zoned property. Staff has reviewed the CUP application subject to the <br />required findings outlined in Sec. 90-37 Conditional use permits of City Code. The primary factors in <br />Staff’s analysis of the criteria were whether the request is within the spirit and intent of the ordinance, <br />and whether the request is compatible with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the character of the <br />surrounding area. Staff found that all of the necessary requirements for approval of a CUP were met. <br />The site plan complies with all building setback, height, and lot coverage requirements. The applicant’s <br />landscaping plan meets ordinance requirements; however, staff has provided that the maintenance of <br />an existing row of evergreen trees along the north property line be a condition to be met in the CUP. <br />The applicant meets lighting and screening requirements; however, screening of rooftop mechanical <br />equipment is listed as a condition in the resolution. <br />The applicant is requesting a variance from the requirement that drive -through businesses have their <br />main entrance located on a State Highway, County Road, or city commercial collector street, in order <br />for their access point to be located on the residential street of Flay Avenue. The primary factors Staff <br />must consider are practical difficulties and spirit and intent of the ordinance. Due to traffic engineering <br />concerns, the proposed drive-through entrance location is the most optimal for minimizing vehicle <br />collisions, and is therefore a reasonable use. The property has few practical options for the location of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.