My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC PACKET 2022.09.22
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2022 PC Packets
>
PC PACKET 2022.09.22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2024 11:42:45 AM
Creation date
3/21/2024 11:13:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/22/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Premier Bank – Site Plan, Zoning Amendment, CUP, and Variances <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances <br />unique to the property not created by the landowner and; <br /> <br />The property is constrained by major arterial streets on the south and east side, as <br />well as an existing single-family home to the north, leaving few options for access <br />and building orientation to meet other areas of the City Code. In order to meet the <br />180’ of vehicle stacking required by ordinance, the applicant would need to <br />reorient the building placement so the drive-through is to the north adjacent to the <br />existing single family home to the north. It is in staff’s opinion that the drive- <br />through lane oriented to the east towards Highway 61 is the best location on the <br />site for the service window. <br /> <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Allowing for a reduction of vehicle stacking would not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood more significantly than if the drive-through lane <br />was constructed with 180’ of stacking per ordinance. <br /> <br />It is in staff’s opinion that there are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance <br />standards. <br /> <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit <br />and intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />It is the spirit and intent of the ordinance to ensure that vehicles queuing for a drive- <br />through business are given ample space to do so without overflowing into other traffic <br />areas such as public streets. If the stacking goes beyond the 115 feet and 4 inches it will <br />be within the parking lot on the site and will not go into a public street and there is a <br />bypass lane for vehicle circulation. It is in staff’s opinion that the variance requested <br />meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />(4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any <br />use prohibited in the district. <br /> <br />The use is allowed in the C-1 zoning district. <br /> <br />(5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of <br />flood protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the <br />minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance <br />shall not be issued within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood <br />levels during the base flood discharge would result. <br /> <br />The project is not located within the FEMA floodplain overlay district. The project is not <br />expected to increase flood levels in the area. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.