My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC PACKET 102722
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2022 PC Packets
>
PC PACKET 102722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2025 1:27:29 PM
Creation date
3/21/2024 11:31:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
10/27/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 22, 2022 PC Minutes <br /> Page 2 <br /> The surrounding properties on the other three corners of the intersection are all zoned C-1 and <br /> occupied by commercial uses. Surrounding properties in the neighborhood to the north and south are <br /> primarily zoned FCB and occupied by residential uses. This property and surrounding properties are <br /> guided Mixed-Use (MIX) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, allowing for a mix of residential, commercial, <br /> office, retail, and public/quasi-public uses.The property is currently vacant, flat, and does not appear <br /> to have wetlands. The property is landscaped with several overhead deciduous trees and lines of <br /> coniferous trees providing screening from the property to the north. <br /> On April 28, 2022, the Planning Commission gave informal comments on the applicant's Sketch Plan, <br /> agreeing with staff that a neighborhood meeting should be held with the property owners to provide <br /> background on the FCB zoning district and how the area may develop. At the neighborhood meeting <br /> held on June 9, 2022, neighbors who were concerned about the guidance of their neighborhood asked <br /> what could be done to prevent future commercial uses in the area, and staff stated that a petition <br /> could be made to consider rezoning the area to a residential district. Staff had not received a petition <br /> to the date of this meeting of the Planning Commission. <br /> The applicant is requesting to rezone the property from Future Central Business (FCB) to Central <br /> Business (C-1). Staff has analyzed this rezoning based on the four criteria in the City ordinance under <br /> Section 90-40,Zoning Amendments. The primary factors in Staff's analysis of the four criteria were the <br /> fact that the FCB zoning is designed to allow for future rezoning to C-1, and that the applicant had <br /> worked closely with staff to design the project with minimal impacts on neighboring residential <br /> properties. Staff found that all of the necessary requirements for approval of a zoning amendment <br /> were met. <br /> The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a drive-through lane to be <br /> within 200 feet of a residentially-zoned property. Staff has reviewed the CUP application subject to the <br /> required findings outlined in Sec. 90-37 Conditional use permits of City Code. The primary factors in <br /> Staff's analysis of the criteria were whether the request is within the spirit and intent of the ordinance, <br /> and whether the request is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of the <br /> surrounding area. Staff found that all of the necessary requirements for approval of a CUP were met. <br /> The site plan complies with all building setback, height, and lot coverage requirements. The applicant's <br /> landscaping plan meets ordinance requirements; however, staff has provided that the maintenance of <br /> an existing row of evergreen trees along the north property line be a condition to be met in the CUP. <br /> The applicant meets lighting and screening requirements; however, screening of rooftop mechanical <br /> equipment is listed as a condition in the resolution. <br /> The applicant is requesting a variance from the requirement that drive-through businesses have their <br /> main entrance located on a State Highway, County Road, or city commercial collector street, in order <br /> for their access point to be located on the residential street of Flay Avenue. The primary factors Staff <br /> must consider are practical difficulties and spirit and intent of the ordinance. Due to traffic engineering <br /> concerns, the proposed drive-through entrance location is the most optimal for minimizing vehicle <br /> collisions, and is therefore a reasonable use. The property has few practical options for the location of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.