My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC PACKET 111022
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2022 PC Packets
>
PC PACKET 111022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2025 1:20:10 PM
Creation date
3/21/2024 11:34:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
11/10/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
development. With the development of a residential use on this property, a zoning amendment <br /> and comprehensive plan amendment would be required. The property would need to be rezoned <br /> to the Medium-density multiple family residential district(R-5), and the land use plan would <br /> need to be amended to guide the property for high density residential (HD). <br /> The R-5 zoning district allows for a maximum density of 10 units per buildable acre, and 12 <br /> units per buildable acre with a PUD. With the current buildable acreage of 7.75 acres, the <br /> applicant could feasibly develop an apartment building with 77 units. However, the applicant is <br /> proposing to create more buildable acreage by filling wetlands on the western portion of the <br /> property, and including a pond which sits on formerly buildable land to create a new total of just <br /> under 9 buildable acres, allowing for the proposed 90 units. It is unlikely that the amount of <br /> wetland fill and impact would be approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). <br /> If the plan incorporated commercial uses on the remaining portion of the property, the applicant <br /> would need to apply for a PUD and for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to the Mixed-Use <br /> (MIX) land use designation. PUDs offer flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of <br /> most normal zoning district standards. The use of PUD zoning can allow for a greater variety of <br /> uses. In exchange for this flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will <br /> result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case <br /> with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. PUD approval may be granted if the <br /> applicant can demonstrate compliance with the following criteria: <br /> 1. The establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create <br /> or maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's comprehensive plan. <br /> 2. The mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not <br /> otherwise be accomplished. <br /> 3. Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to <br /> improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements <br /> (e.g., construction materials, landscaping, lighting, open space, etc.) that exceed the City's <br /> standards to offset the effect of any variations. <br /> 4. A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time <br /> protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and <br /> general welfare of the City. <br /> 5. Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not <br /> limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, <br /> development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint <br /> facilities and utilities. <br /> 6. Maintenance or improvement for the efficiency of public streets and utilities. <br /> 7. Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. <br /> It is unclear how the proposed plan would meet the PUD criteria, and the proposed plan would <br /> likely change significantly with a PUD application. <br /> The applicant has stated that previous attempts of commercial development on the property have <br /> not been successful, and that the portion of more buildable property where the apartment is <br /> proposed to be located, facing Rosemary Way, is more viable for residential development than <br /> 3 <br /> Rosemary Place Sketch Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.