My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC PACKET 111022
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2022 PC Packets
>
PC PACKET 111022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2025 1:20:10 PM
Creation date
3/21/2024 11:34:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
11/10/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 27,2022 PC Minutes <br /> Page 7 <br /> rezoning and changing land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Bear stated currently, the <br /> highest allowed density for residential use is 12 units per acre, but that may need to change <br /> considering market trends demanding higher density, as well as a changing appetite in the community. <br /> Stalland asks if a new ordinance would need to be created with a rezoning of the property. Bear states <br /> that in an area designated for mixed-use, rezoning to a PUD district is usually anticipated. However, in <br /> areas guided for commercial use, there is no zoning district to allow 20 units per acre. Stalland asks <br /> about the Metropolitan Council's guide for density within the City, and Bear responds that the city- <br /> wide goal is 3 units per acre, and that the city needs to demonstrate how that goal is achieved when <br /> allowing a 20 unit-per-acre project. <br /> Commissioner Petty asks for clarification on how the mixed-use area could be extended. Bear states <br /> that he's heard some discussion around apartments in the mixed-use area, and that depending on <br /> where the extended frontage road ends up in the final plans that some options to the south may be <br /> available. <br /> Chair Kleissler asks the commissioners how they feel about a jump in density. Bear states that this <br /> won't be the last time that an apartment project with this density will be requested, and that the <br /> Planning Commission may want to consider an approach to high-density apartments in the future. <br /> Stalland states that the market is heavily demanding more multifamily housing, and that the cost of <br /> utilities can't justify construction at 12 units per acre. <br /> Chair Kleissler asks if the applicant is requesting any further specific feedback. Stalland states that he <br /> wants to know if they're interested in higher density and if they can give him a preferred location. <br /> Commissioner Arcand states that his first choice for a location would be on Oneka Parkway but further <br /> away from CSAH 8. Chair Kleissler says that the location in the sketch plan is her least favorite, but not <br /> sure about a favorite. <br /> Commissioner Petty states that she is comfortable with a density of 20 units per acre, but that the <br /> Planning Commission and City need to be strategic about where it is placed. Commissioner Arcand <br /> states that he wants to consider how the "rural feel" of Hugo can preserved with high density. Bear <br /> replies that high-level questions like that start with the Comprehensive Plan, and that the discussion <br /> shouldn't be had without interest from the Planning Commission. <br /> Lentsch asks the commissioners what they have heard from the community in terms of what they <br /> would like to see in commercially-designated areas. Several commissioners respond that the number <br /> one item is restaurants, with some demand for smaller retail uses like drug stores. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.