My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA Packet 10.18.22
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2022 EDA Packets
>
EDA Packet 10.18.22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2024 2:11:06 PM
Creation date
3/26/2024 2:08:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
10/18/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 Oneka Commons Sketch Plan 2022 <br /> <br />Utilities <br /> <br />Municipal sewer and water is available to the site. Once development phasing is proposed, staff <br />can better determine the best means for servicing the site. The Metropolitan Council sewer <br />interceptor runs through the property. There is an easement along this sewer line. Development <br />of the property will need to be outside of the easement area, however, it is likely streets can cross <br />the sewer line easement. <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> <br />Because of the constraints of the property including wetlands, floodplain/floodway, and <br />creeks/ditches, it is likely the buildable area of the property is less that what has been shown on <br />the plans and the proposed sketch plan will likely change significantly when these items are <br />evaluated. Staff recommends the applicant evaluate the wetlands, floodplain/floodway, and <br />shoreland district regulations to determine the buildable area of the property, then prepare <br />development plans for the property. It is unclear if this was taken into consideration with the <br />proposed overall sketch plan. <br /> <br />The proposed sketch plan shows each parcel being developed separately. It is in staff’s opinion <br />that the applicant is not showing a vision for a mixed-use development that blends the uses <br />together. <br /> <br />Staff recommends discussion on the following: <br /> <br />• Develop the property using the existing land use plan/designations for the property, but it <br />may be reasonable to consider: <br />o The residential area south of Victor Path (frontage road) may be able to <br />accommodate higher density residential that would provide appropriate <br />transitions from single family residential to commercial uses. <br />o The apartment complex could be integrated into a mixed-use development <br />blending the various uses with the buildings relating to each other or could be <br />located in areas with residential land use. <br />o The EDA should comment specifically on the location of the apartments in the <br />area designated commercial in the 2040 Land Use Plan. <br />• Incorporate the Downtown Design Guidelines into the development. <br />• Incorporate the Parks Commission comments into the development. <br />• Incorporate stormwater reuse into the development. <br />• Incorporate regional stormwater management into the development. <br />• Phasing of road construction for the property. <br /> <br />The applicant is requesting review and comments on a sketch plan for the properties showing <br />residential and commercial uses on the property. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.