My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Parks Packet 04.20.22
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2022
>
Parks Packet 04.20.22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2024 1:07:26 PM
Creation date
4/4/2024 12:52:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
4/20/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Bryan Bear <br />April 15, 2022 <br />Page 7 <br />G:\.Clients All\Hugo\Proposals\Northstar <br />Bank\LETTER_HUGO_NorthstarBank_041522_Final.docx <br />document hydrology across the site and better understand the ability of the site to receive credit <br />for wetland banking. The cost of competing this task is $3,870 which includes installation of the <br />monitoring wells, monthly data downloads, data analysis, and a report. <br /> <br />Veg Monitoring <br /> <br />The prospectus will require some data on vegetation to fully create the replacement plan; <br />specifically the vegetation management section. The survey data would allow us to identify the <br />existing vegetative community, invasives and natives, and which native plants would be <br />appropriate for establishment. We will conduct an initial vegetation survey of the proposed bank <br />site using standard methodology developed by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest <br />Service. This initial survey will include sample plots within each of the three existing wetland plant <br />communities. Data collected during this survey will allow us to assess the existing vegetative <br />communities and to document changes in plant species cover and frequency over time. The data <br />collected will allow us to develop a Floristic Quality Index for easy comparison between before <br />and after restoration, allowing the City to provide evidence of an increased functional lift. The <br />cost for this would be $4,398 which includes field work and a memo summarizing the results of <br />the survey. <br /> <br />Draft Prospectus <br /> <br />After collecting data on hydrology and vegetation, and, if this data shows that a substantial <br />amount of credit can be generated as discussed earlier in this letter, a draft prospectus would be <br />completed. This is a relatively simple process that identifies the bank area boundaries, credit <br />actions, total amount of credit, and identifies any issues that would impact the bank. This <br />deliverable would include a credit table and wetland bank map, identifying credit actions. The <br />cost for this is $6,196. Activities include a site visit, development and submittal of draft <br />prospectus to TEP, and a meeting with the TEP and city to obtain comments. Thi s will provide <br />direction to the city as to the feasibility of the bank and identify issues to be addressed in the <br />future prospectus. <br /> <br /> <br />Cost Estimating <br /> <br />If the draft prospectus feedback indicates that the bank is viable and development of the <br />prospectus and wetland banking is warranted, prior to the development of these documents, <br />creating a cost estimate for City staff to review would provide a basis for determining if the next <br />steps are in fact warranted. These would allow staff to understand the “all-in” cost of bank <br />development and compare that to the revenue that may potentially be generated by the bank. <br />This cost estimate would include engineering, design, permitting, construction, and monitoring for <br />the time needed to establish the bank. The typical time involves maximum two years for <br />permitting and five years for monitoring to prove the restoration is successful. This can be <br />reduced depending on how the site performs. Based on a seven (7) year period, the total for this <br />task is $7,500. <br /> <br />These tasks can be approved on a step-by-step basis, meaning that after collecting the hydrology <br />and vegetation data, the city can review the data and make a determination on if they would like <br />to move on to the next step in the process outlined above. Meaning that the draft prospectus <br />would only be completed if the vegetation and hydrology data showed that development of the <br />draft prospectus would be warranted. Likewise, the cost estimate task would only be completed <br />at the conclusion of the draft prospectus task if the TEP review proved favorable to the <br />development of the bank. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.