Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Prospectus Document Page 6 07/07/2020 <br />There are two open water areas that show up on aerial photographs, one near the stormwater ponds at the <br />school and one near the Hwy 61 right-of-way. A review of historic aerial photographs shows that the pond near <br />Hwy 61 was created between 1953 and 1964. The pond by the school was created between 1964 and 1974. Both <br />ponds appear to have been created by the farmer however there does appear to be a constructed berm around <br />the pond near Hwy 61 and further investigation and discussion with MnDOT is needed to determine is this is a <br />stormwater treatment basin. <br />Most of the site is partially drained due to extensive ditching throughout. Low and fluctuating levels of water in <br />the wetland have caused reed canary grass to grow. Based on an initial vegetation survey conducted during the <br />2022 growing season, there are also areas of the wetland with less invasive species and a mix of native <br />hydrophytic plants. The results from this survey are included in Appendix C. As briefly described above, site <br />management will be critical while establishing the vegetation on this site and during future ongoing maintenance <br />of the site. <br />There are two linear easements that are mapped through or near the site as described above. The judicial ditch 3 <br />has a drainage easement along the western boundary of the parcel as well as a Metropolitan Council sewer line. <br />There is also an above ground transmission line in the northwest corner and northern boundary of the site. The <br />proposed conservation easement boundary excludes known easements. <br />Correspondence with FSA will occur due to the site proximity to Benson Airport approximately 3.5 miles to the <br />south of the wetland bank site. <br /> <br />Project Expectations <br />Estimate how many wetland acres your project will restore, enhance, create, or preserve and briefly describe why <br />your project is eligible to use these credit actions. If you are unfamiliar with state and federal credit actions, <br />reviewers may be able to identify likely credit actions applicable to your project. If you have estimated your site’s <br />credit potential, provide this estimate and describe the basis for this estimate. <br /> <br />The proposed conditions of the site include abandoning constructed ditches and establishing a runout elevation <br />of the wetland that will allow the restoration of historic hydrologic conditions. The proposed restored wetland <br />will re-establish subsurface hydrology to existing hydric soils and re-establish native plant communities through <br />seeding and vegetative management. <br />Credit Area Proposed Credit <br />Action <br />Credit Allocation Acres Credit Amount <br />Wetland Restoration (3) 100 19.6 19.6000 <br />Wetland Rehabilitation (4B) 50 98.71 49.3550 <br />Upland Upland Buffer 25 5.12 1.2800 <br />Total 123.43 70.235 <br /> <br />Other Information <br />Include any other project or property information you want agencies to know or consider as they evaluate your <br />wetland replacement project. For example, are there known or anticipated plans for other portions of your <br />property or adjacent properties?