My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024.05.20 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2024 CC Packet
>
2024.05.20 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2024 10:57:41 AM
Creation date
5/23/2024 10:55:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
5/20/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />[204185/1] 10 <br />a. White Bear Lake is hydrologically connected to the Prairie du <br />Chien and Jordan aquifers. <br />b. The model [from the U.S. Geologic Survey] demonstrates that <br />a 30 percent increase in groundwater pumping (from the <br />2002-2013 average) causes White Bear Lake to fall by <br />1.5 feet. <br />c. A 30 percent reduction in groundwater pumping (from the <br />2002-2013 average) would cause White Bear Lake to rise by <br />1.5 feet. <br />d. The [U.S. Geologic Survey’s] findings are “conclusive proof <br />that water from White Bear Lake is entering the Prairie du <br />Chien Aquifer and is being pumped out by [DNR-permitted <br />wells] in the area of White Bear Lake.” <br />e. As a general rule, groundwater use increases in dry years and <br />declines in wet years. <br />f. The increase in use is primarily due to non-agricultural <br />irrigation; that is, lawn watering. <br />g. This non-essential use accounts for about 30 percent of <br />annual (not just summer) water use in the northeast metro. <br />h. To have an impact on the water level in [White Bear Lake] <br />actual groundwater use must be reduced, not just the <br />permitted amount, [because] not everyone pumps their total <br />appropriation. <br />i. Pumping from wells five or more miles from the lake does <br />impact it. Mr. Grubb testified that five miles is the minimum <br />range of impact, and identified a number of wells of that <br />distance that had a “very significant influence” on the lake. <br />Dr. Tonkin found a significant number of wells between 6-12 <br />miles from White Bear Lake that had an impact, and Dr. Berg <br />agreed that wells “far” from the lake can have “a significant <br />effect” depending on their pumping rate. <br />j. Ms. Ekman, from the DNR, calculated that by implementing <br />an irrigation ban, the DNR could reduce use by as much as <br />25 to 40 percent. The DNR admits there is “significant <br />opportunity” to reduce water use by targeting summer water <br />use, and that “we need to find ways to reduce this dramatic <br />increase [in water use] in the summer.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.