My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024.06.03 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2024 CC Packet
>
2024.06.03 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2024 3:49:14 PM
Creation date
6/14/2024 10:05:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
6/3/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Osterman Variance – 12494 Goodview Ave N <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br />The proposed location is relatively flat and requires a minimal amount of tree removal. <br />The request is due to unique circumstances of the property. <br /> <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />The accessory building ordinance discourages having accessory buildings located in front <br />of the house. While this property is located in the R-3 zoning district, it is surrounded by <br />large lot parcels with accessory buildings, including some lots with accessory buildings <br />placed in front of the house. The proposed location of the building is screened by existing <br />trees both from the adjacent property to the north and the street, which does not create a <br />visual disruption relative to the rest of the neighborhood. The requested variance will not <br />alter the essential character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />It is in staff’s opinion that the proposed accessory building has practical difficulties in meeting <br />the ordinance standard. <br /> <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The spirit and intent of the accessory building ordinance is to not have the accessory building <br />dominate the look of the front of the house. However, the existing dense lines of trees provide <br />adequate screening of the building from the road and property line. Additionally, the proposed <br />location of the building is offset from the front of the house so as not to dominate the look of the <br />property from the road. It is in staff’s opinion that the requested variance is keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the accessory building ordinance. <br /> (4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br />Accessory buildings are permitted in the R-3 zoning district. <br />(5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum <br />necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued <br />within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br />discharge would result. <br />The property is not located within a FEMA designated floodplain. <br />(6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject <br />property is in compliance with city and state codes. <br /> <br />The property is served by a well and septic system. <br /> <br />6. CONCLUSION: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.