My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024.07.15 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2024 CC Minutes
>
2024.07.15 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 9:10:10 AM
Creation date
10/4/2024 9:03:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
7/15/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Meeting Minutes for July 15, 2024 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />recap of the audit of City finances for the 2023 fiscal year. The audit report was posted on the <br />City’s website. <br /> <br />Jason began by saying the City had a clean audit, and he extended appreciation for the hard work <br />of Council and staff. He explained what the audit entails and said an unmodified audit opinion <br />was issued. He talked about a new section that required a single audit in 2023 as a result of <br />spending ARPA funds, and no issues were found in testing. He reviewed the items that were <br />required to be tested. He showed that property taxes were the largest revenue source, and he <br />provided data on the different fund types. <br /> <br />General Government Expenditures increased by 11% from 2022 due primarily to increased <br />salaries for fully staffed Planning Department. Public safety expenditures increased by 9% due <br />to increased fire and police protection. The highways and streets expenditures decreased in <br />wages while materials and maintenance increased resulting in less than 1% difference from 2022. <br />Expenditures for parks increased 30% in part due to the new Pede Pedersen Park facility. He <br />talked about the benefit of the City’s policy to have at least 50% of the following year’s budget <br />in reserves saying the fund was healthy largely due to ARPA funds that will be spent at a later <br />time. <br /> <br />Jason showed the City’s five-year debt service requirements saying payments were being made <br />on time. He talked about recent Capital improvement projects that included Oneka Parkway, <br />Birch tree ponds, and access control systems at the new Public Works, Lions Park Pavilion, and <br />the Hanifl Shelter. He explained enterprise funds were doing well due to the increase in water <br />billing revenue and good investment gains. Jason summarized by saying the City was issued an <br />unmodified audit opinion with no single audit or Minnesota legal compliance exceptions. <br /> <br />Petryk made motion, Klein seconded, to accept the results of the audit. <br /> <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Washington County Update on Highway 61 Visioning Study – Maddie Dahlheimer <br /> <br />Washington County, MnDOT, and the City of Hugo had partnered on a corridor visioning study <br />along Highway 61. A traffic, land use, and engineering analysis along with community input <br />helped identify the long-range vision for the corridor that would be used to define future <br />improvements and guide a potential jurisdictional transfer of the roadway from MnDOT to <br />Washington County. The goals of the study included items such as evaluation of intersection <br />improvements, defining access points, and determining right-of-way needs for the corridor for a <br />possible expansion of the roadway. <br /> <br />Madeline Dahlheimer from Washington County was present to provide an update. Before she <br />began, Washington County Commissioner Fran Miron talked about the staff and partnerships <br />that provided a great collaboration. He talked about the turnback being part of the long-range <br />planning since 1996. Madeline showed a map of the study area and explained in 1996, there was <br />intent to transfer the portion of TH61 in Washington County from MnDOT to Washington <br />County. She provided background on the visioning study for Highway 61 and how it related to <br />the Rush Line Transit Corridor, the City’s Downtown Plan and Design Guidelines, and the <br />Corridor Access Management Plan MOU and Layout that illustrated the right-of-way needed for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.