Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for Midyear Budget Review on September 30, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />$9,140.036. Totaling all levies, the proposed 2025 levy totaled $11,997,855. Anna talked about <br />fiscal disparities saying Hugo receives more back than it contributes, and the City’s proposed <br />distribution will increase 14.45% equaling $1,015,758 <br /> <br />Anna talked about the tax impact of the proposed levy. The median valued homestead of <br />$389,400 after the market value exclusion would see a tax of $1,380 at the proposed 36.522% <br />rate. This would decrease the tax from 2024 by $116. Hugo’s tax rate had always fallen near the <br />middle in comparison to other cities in Washington County, but it was noted that some other <br />cities charged for other services. Hugo does not collect any additional fees. Residents would see <br />a decreased tax bill from Hugo, but other districts collected taxes, so overall taxes may increase. <br /> <br />City Engineer Mark Erichson provided information on the 2025 Street CIP. The CIP is <br />evaluated each year by working with the Public Works Department to determine what the <br />condition of the roadways are. The City was waiting for MnDOT to finish their rating on the <br />bridges to see if they qualified for funding. If needed, street projects would be rescheduled to <br />accommodate an upcoming bridge project if necessary. Mark shared costs associated with each <br />project saying some will be state aid eligible for reimbursement. He shared discussions had with <br />Lino Lakes regarding Elmcrest Avenue due to the expected increase in traffic when Otter Lake <br />Road in Lino Lakes is constructed, saying there may be cost sharing with Lino. There were also <br />concerns regarding 165th Street, partly due to the size of the project and lack of development to <br />help pay for it. <br /> <br />Council discussed the CIP and were concerned about unfunded road projects, two bridge repair <br />projects, and trail maintenance. No money was budgeted for Elmcrest Avenue or 165th Street, <br />and those roads were anticipated to be highly traveled with the construction of Otter Lake Road. <br />There were questions about the safety of the bridges, specifically Fable Hills Bridge. Erichson <br />responded that the structural integrity was there, it was getting very costly to maintain the <br />decking. Aging trail networks had not been identified for improvements, costs, or funding. <br /> <br />There was discussion about reverting back to following the flat tax pate policy and the 39.403% <br />tax rate. It was noted the budget as presented could fund the projects identified on the current <br />CIP until 2029, but they were rough estimates and did not include other anticipated projects. <br />Anna stated that by following policy, $800,000 could be added to the Street Fund. <br /> <br />Council members expressed desire to keep the proposed tax rate but were concerned the City <br />would be getting further behind. The normal rate would allow the City to address upcoming <br />unfunded needs and prevent a huge rate increase if they waited. Council members commented <br />on the need for safe, decent roads. The proposed budget would keep the City functioning as <br />usual, but the sacrifice would go to the street fund. There was discussion on amending the <br />assessment policy, which had been in place since 2013. Road projects had increased <br />significantly, and this was part of the equation to add stability to the fund in the future. It was <br />noted that the fund currently had a healthy balance, but at the end of five years, it will have <br />dropped way down. It was generally agreed a workshop was necessary to discuss strategies to <br />budget for it. <br /> <br />