My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024.11.18 RESO 2024-56 Variance for Deck at 12757 Homestead Drive
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2024 CC Resolutions
>
2024.11.18 RESO 2024-56 Variance for Deck at 12757 Homestead Drive
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:11:27 PM
Creation date
11/19/2024 3:11:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
11/18/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 2024-56 <br /> APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK <br /> WITHIN THE SHORELAND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF SUNSET LAKE <br /> FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12757 HOMESTEAD DRIVE NORTH <br /> WHEREAS, Jim and Laurie Stodola have requested approval of a variance to allow <br /> construction of a proposed deck to be located 56 feet from the ordinary high-water level of <br /> Sunset Lake, where a setback of 100 feet is required by ordinance, on property legally <br /> described as follows: <br /> Lot 10, Block 1, Royalhaven Estates, Washington County, Minnesota. <br /> WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals has reviewed said variance at <br /> a duly called public hearing on November 14, 2024, and recommends approval with the <br /> following findings and conditions: <br /> 1. The proposed facilities shall be in adherence to the site plan dated September 26, <br /> 2024. <br /> 2. The proposed variance is permissible by law. <br /> 3. The proposed deck would be constructed in-line with the rear of the existing house, <br /> there are existing mature trees that provide screening from the view of neighboring <br /> properties, and the proposed deck meets all other building requirements, <br /> establishing the deck as a reasonable use. <br /> 4. The existing house is already located within the minimum shoreland setback, and <br /> construction of the deck in a location that meets the shoreland rules would place <br /> the deck in front of the house, facing the road and significantly altering the view of <br /> the house from the road, creating unique circumstances that are not created by the <br /> landowner. <br /> 5. The proposed deck would be located behind the house, and will be screened from <br /> the view of neighboring properties by existing trees. The proposed deck being <br /> constructed in-line with the existing house will not significantly alter the view from <br /> the public water. The requested variance will not alter the essential character of the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> 6. There are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standards. <br /> 7. The spirit and intent of the setbacks within the shoreland ordinance is to protect the <br /> view from public waters from being dominated by buildings. Since the deck will <br /> be constructed in-line with the existing house, the requested variance will not <br /> significantly alter the view of the house from the public water. The variance as <br /> requested meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> 8. The use is allowed in the RR zoning district. <br /> 9. The property is not located within a floodplain area. <br /> 10. The property is served by City sewer and water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.