Laserfiche WebLink
Stodola Variance – 12757 Homestead Drive North <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br />b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique <br />to the property not created by the landowner and; <br /> <br />This property, along with several neighboring properties on the shore of Sunset Lake, <br />have houses that were likely constructed prior to the adoption of shoreland rules <br />regulating structural setbacks from lakes. A large portion of the existing house is <br />currently located within the required 100-foot setback from the OHWL of the lake. <br />Construction of the deck in a location where it meets the shoreland setback requirement <br />would place the deck in front of the house and facing the road, rather than behind the <br />house and facing the lake. Any deck on the east side of the house would require a <br />variance. The requested variance is due to unique circumstances. <br /> <br /> <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />The deck would be placed behind the house, meaning that it would not be visible from <br />view of the road, and will be screened from the view of adjacent properties by existing <br />trees. The view from the public water would not be significantly altered because the deck <br />is proposed to be constructed in-line with the existing house. The requested variance <br />would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood, <br /> <br />It is in staff’s opinion that the proposed deck has practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance <br />standard. <br /> <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The spirit and intent of the minimum setbacks outlined in the shoreland ordinance is to protect <br />the view from public waters from being dominated by buildings. The deck would be constructed <br />in-line with the existing house, and would not significantly alter the view of the house from the <br />lake. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers the state shoreland <br />rules (MR 6120.2500 – 6120.3900) and makes recommendations on variance requests for local <br />shoreland ordinances. The DNR area hydrologist has reviewed the proposal, and recommends <br />that if the variance is approved that the City apply conditions to mitigate potential impacts. Staff <br />is requiring that all existing trees will remain as a condition of approval in the variance <br />resolution. Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance meets the spirit and intent of the <br />shoreland ordinance. <br /> (4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br />Decks are permitted in the RR zoning district. <br /> <br />