PC PACKET 04.11.2024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Enterprise Energy 2925 Dean Parkway, Execu8ve Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 (952) 212-0824 2 History of Project and Submittal Updates: Enterprise Energy initially contacted the City about this project in December 2022. The City enacted a moratorium on solar and revised its ordinance. Fortunately, the ordinance amendment still permits this project on this parcel. After the ordinance amendment, in December 2023 we met with City staff, City engineers, and City wetland enforcement agency to review our submittal and assure that our application meets the heightened scrutiny of the new ordinance. We received feedback and additional engineering and environmental requests. After attempting to address those requests, we resubmitted materials in February 2024 and received additional feedback and requests. After working closely with staff and City engineering consultants for a very long time, we believe that this application satisfies the ordinance. This ordinance required extraordinarily detailed and thoroughly engineered plans. We spent an enormous amount of time and money to prepare and demonstrate the functionality of our Stormwater Management Plan, Vegetation Management Plan, Grading Plan, Erosion Control Plan, Wetland Delineation and No-Loss Determination, Decommissioning Plan, ALTA Survey, and Site Plan. We also did extensive diligence on the parcel including FAA Glare Analysis, Geotechnical Field Soil Electric Resistivity Testing, Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Services Endangered Wildlife and Species Search, and Phase I Environmental Assessment, and Phase I Archeological Reconnaissance. These plans were very expensive and required a nearly complete civil engineering set. Typically, many of these submittals are not required as part of a IUP application and are instead required as conditions of the IUP, to be submitted with the building permit application. Requiring this material up front adds a lot of risk to the project because the IUP is not guaranteed. However, we believe in this project and our ability to design it in a way that will be beneficial to the City, so we endeavored to do the work anyway. We hope that the City carefully considers the work that has been done to date to prepare this application. Wetland Delineation & Notice of Decision: We hired a third-party consultant to perform a wetland delineation on the property. The delineation identifies the location and type of all wetlands. The delineation and finalized site plan were sent to the City engineering consultant for a “no-loss” determination, which is an affirmation that the plan does not adversely impact the wetlands. The no-loss determination not only considers the impact of these specific wetlands, our specific plan, and the specific site characteristics, but it also considers the hydrology and environmental characteristics of surrounding parcels, and how the plan could adversely impact them. Our consultant and the City’s consultant agree that this project will not have a negative impact. The Wetland Boundary Concurrence and No-Loss Determination are attached as Exhibits 2 & 3. Environmental Diligence: Apart from wetlands, we had our environmental consultant perform extensive environmental diligence studies, including a Plant Survey that identifies all vegetation growing on the parcel, a Wildlife Species Search that identifies all wildlife that uses the parcel all year, a Phase I Environmental Assessment to determine if there has been any environmental contamination of the parcel, and a Phase I Archeological Study to determine if the parcel has any historical or archeological significance. The studies did not reveal any