My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC PACKET 05.09.2024
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2024 PC Packets
>
PC PACKET 05.09.2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 11:44:43 AM
Creation date
3/6/2025 11:35:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 11, 2024 PC Minutes <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />about the drainage and impacts to Clearwater Creek and Bald Eagle Lake. Peltier stated that he was <br />concerned about the apparent discrepancy in z oning. <br /> <br />Nathan Dull, 18370 English Ave, Farmington MN, representing the Minnesota Land and Liberty <br />Coalition, says that the group advocated for property rights and green energy. Dull stated that <br />technological advancements have decreased the overall size of 1 megawatt systems, and that this <br />project is much smaller than the 320-megawatt systems that are seen in counties further north. Dull <br />stated that concerns about EMF can be compared to cell phone radiation and lithium ion batteries. Dull <br />stated that there are larger forces that can disrupt property values than a solar farm. Mike Happ <br />approached the podium stating he wanted to know who Dull is and why he was there, and ultimately <br />asked if Dull was there to support the project. Dull said yes. <br /> <br />Levi Shepherd asked if anyone on the Planning Commission has been a realtor or has a real estate <br />background, Commissioner Kelly raised his hand. Shepherd stated that cell phones are heavily <br />regulated and that their materials are more controlled. Shepherd restated his po ints about health <br />concerns and protecting his view. <br /> <br />John Udsteun restated that he wanted the proposal to be tabled to give him time to develop a legal <br />case against the project. <br /> <br />Laura Syring restated previous points and stated that she wants the Commissioners to view the <br />proposal from her property. Syring asked the question if the Commissioners would want a solar farm <br />next to their property. <br /> <br />Jimmie Gregoire also invited the Commissioners to view the solar farm adjacent to his property. <br />Gregoire asked if any of the Commissioners had questions for him, and stated that he prefers that the <br />questions be asked directly to him and not directed at staff. Acting Chair Derr said the Planning <br />Commission will continue to take comments and if they have any questions of Gregoire they’ll ask him. <br /> <br />Arnie Triemert stated that other solar farms are not near houses or large developments. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Juba suggested that the Planning Commission take some time to <br />address questions. Juba stated that there can be confusion between zoning, land use designation, and <br />what appears on property taxes. Juba stated that the property is zoned Agricultural, meaning that <br />everything allowed in the AG district is allowed on that property, including solar farms. Jub a stated that <br />the City doesn’t use the 2030 Comprehensive Plan anymore, but that the 2040 Comprehensive Plan <br />designates many properties in eastern Hugo as large lot residential. Juba stated that Washington <br />County determines the use for property taxes based on how it’s actively being used, not the zoning <br />classification. Juba stated that this application has gone through the same process that the City uses <br />for every development project, and that there’s a lot of time between when a project is first proposed <br />and when the application is complete and the public is notified. Juba pointed to the section in the <br />ordinance that allows for the Planning Commission to recommend additional conditions to the IUP, <br />which can be used to mitigate concerns about the fence or screening if they so choose. Juba stated <br />that the applicant would be the best to answer questions about health concerns or sheer factor.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.