My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025.03.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2025 CC Packets
>
2025.03.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:13:46 PM
Creation date
3/18/2025 1:09:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/17/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br />PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION <br />STAFF REPORT <br />TO: Bryan Bear, Community Development Director <br />FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director <br />SUBJECT: Capstone Homes – 5311 165th Street (Munger Property) – Sketch Plan <br />DATE: March 12, 2025, for the City Council Meeting of March 17, 2025. <br />REVIEW DEADLINE (60) days: March 28, 2025 <br />1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: <br />At its February 27, 2025, meeting the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan and <br />provided feedback on the overall development. <br />Generally the Planning Commission was okay with the proposed PUD standards and housing <br />products. They had comments on revisions to the plan and feedback in meeting the PUD criteria. <br />They liked the idea of the lots having views over the natural spaces, but discussed how the <br />developer could provide more creativity to the layout and add character the development in <br />exchange for the proposed flexibility to zoning standards. <br />The Planning Commission members suggested the applicant add variation or curvature to the long, <br />straight road that is shown along the east side of the sketch plan and to include staggered building <br />setbacks. They wanted the developer to not have lots with direct access to 165th Street. Additional <br />suggestions included: <br />•Offering a one-story product. <br />•Asked about integration of the two smaller parcels under separate ownership to make the <br />development more cohesive. <br />•Construction of one large pond rather than several small ponds and they would like to see <br />the evaluation if stormwater reuse can be integrated into the development. <br />•Wanted to see an off-road trail loop with amenities, such as landscaping and benches. <br />•Agreed with staff’s recommendations. <br />The same sketch plan the Planning Commission reviewed is attached, the developer did not make <br />any changes. However, the developer stated they would redesign the sketch plan after receiving <br />the feedback and offered the following: <br />J.1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.