My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BZ Packet 10.12.23
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Board of Zoning
>
BOZA Agendas/Packets
>
2023
>
BZ Packet 10.12.23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2025 10:13:11 AM
Creation date
5/1/2025 10:12:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Smith Variance – 12033 Everton Avenue North <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> 3 <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Accessory buildings up to 1,500 square feet are common in the R-1 zoning district. The <br />zoning district’s building setbacks are designed for lots with a minimum size of 1 acre. <br />The accessory building ordinance discourages the construction of accessory buildings in <br />front of the principal building on site. The City-owned parcels adjacent to the location of <br />the proposed accessory building are currently vacant. Staff is of the opinion that the <br />proposed accessory building will not disrupt the essential character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />It is in staff’s opinion that there are practical difficulties in meeting the setback requirements for <br />the R-1 zoning district due to the geographic constraints of the site. <br /> <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The spirit and intent of the ordinance for a rear yard setback is to require a minimum amount of <br />space between buildings and the property line. It is the staff’s opinion that there would be a <br />reasonable amount of space between the proposed accessory building, existing shed, and the <br />property line, although the building would encroach into the rear yard setback. The variance as <br />requested meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> (4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br />Accessory buildings are a permitted use in the R-1 zoning district. <br />(5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum <br />necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued <br />within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br />discharge would result. <br />The property is not located within a FEMA designated floodplain. <br />(6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject <br />property is in compliance with city and state codes. <br /> <br />The property is served by municipal water and sanitary sewer services. <br /> <br />5. CONCLUSION: <br /> <br />It in staff’s opinion that the applicant meets all the criteria necessary to approve the variance <br />request. <br /> <br />6. RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the variance requests subject to the conditions in the resolution.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.