Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for Midyear Budget Review on September 15, 2025 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />provided separate vacation and sick time, while others, like Hugo, combined the two into <br />personal leave time. Bear presented a chart comparing Hugo to other cities that use personal <br />leave time, which showed that Hugo was behind at the beginning of employment, in line <br />between five and ten years, but lacking again after fifteen years or more. He proposed a revised <br />personal leave schedule that would make the City more competitive. <br /> <br />Other proposed items in the updated policy include double-time for work on holidays, vision <br />coverage, short-term disability versus Paid Family Medical Leave, parental leave, bereavement <br />leave, and other mandatory leaves. There would be no policy for remote work, though exceptions <br />could be made. <br /> <br />Strub asked about the carryover program for personal leave time. Bear replied that employees <br />were allowed to carry over 520 hours and would be eligible to receive payment for that amount <br />upon termination. <br /> <br />Weidt questioned whether there had been pushback from new employees. Bear responded that <br />the policy had been modified to provide them with 40 banked hours at the start of employment, <br />with the opportunity to earn more after six months. He acknowledged that not providing time off <br />for new hires could place the City at a competitive disadvantage. <br /> <br />Strub shared that in his past employment, vacation time increased gradually, and another <br />employer allowed employees to purchase additional vacation time using sick leave hours. <br /> <br />Bear stated that staff would continue to review the policy and welcomed additional feedback. <br /> <br />Krull expressed support for Bear setting the policy, and the Council generally agreed that he was <br />on the right track. <br /> <br />Staff will present the updated policy for adoption by the end of the year. <br /> <br />Hopkins Schoolhouse <br /> <br />City Administrator Bryan Bear provided background information on the restoration of the <br />historic schoolhouse. It was noted that the project had accomplished the first part of its mission, <br />with assistance from the City on brush removal, mowing, and snowplowing. Progress had been <br />made on the exterior of the building. <br /> <br />The Mayor reported he had met Liz to talk about the remaining work to be done. Bear stated he <br />received a list of from Hopkins Schoolhouse and Heritage Center Chair Liz Cinqueonce of <br />remaining work to be done that was estimated at approximately $400,000 to make the building <br />occupiable. <br /> <br />The Council discussed whether the City should participate financially in the completion of the <br />schoolhouse, and if so, to what extent. What needed to be considered was the City’s <br />expectations for the site and whether that should influence the outcome, and how the future use <br />of the building might affect design decisions.