My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025.09.15 CC Minutes - Midyear Budget Review
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2025 CC Minutes
>
2025.09.15 CC Minutes - Midyear Budget Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2025 3:27:02 PM
Creation date
11/20/2025 3:23:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
9/15/2025
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for Midyear Budget Review on September 15, 2025 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Weidt noted that although the project once faced the possibility of demolition, the current plan <br />had accomplished a great deal. He observed that while donations had been strong, progress may <br />begin to slow. He suggested it would be a better use of funds to invest now to make it a <br />worthwhile City asset. He stated that the building should be made into a usable facility for <br />residents and not allowed to drift into an unfinished “Crazy Horse” type project. He proposed the <br />possibility of matching donations. <br /> <br />Becky asked whether the committee envisioned a change in purpose. Bear replied that the <br />Committee intended to maintain it as a heritage center. He added that the City had already been <br />required to carry additional insurance coverage as improvements were made. <br /> <br />Miron voiced his support for the project, stating that the group had done good work and that the <br />City should help bring it to completion. He suggested the possibility of a joint workshop but <br />noted the challenge of deciding whether to commit financial support immediately or evaluate the <br />project’s future purpose first. <br /> <br />Krull stated his preference to avoid the use of taxpayer funds but acknowledged the good points <br />raised. He emphasized the importance of ensuring that all private donations were utilized before <br />City funds were committed. <br /> <br />Petryk added that small rental venues are in short supply and suggested the building could be <br />used for rentals similar to other City facilities. She questioned whether the City’s role should <br />focus on recouping its investment or supporting the committee’s vision. <br /> <br />Weidt noted that the project should remain aligned with the committee’s goals but emphasized <br />that the City owned the building and retained rights over its future use. <br /> <br />Strub stated that the schoolhouse represents a valuable asset that could serve as a heritage center <br />while also offering additional possibilities. He noted its location at a trailhead expanded its <br />potential uses. He supported holding a workshop to further evaluate the City’s role in the project. <br /> <br />Weidt, made motion, Miron seconded, to adjourn at 6:57 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br /> Michele Lindau, <br />City Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.