Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance 2011-455 <br />6. a summary statement as to why the dog should not be declared dangerous or <br />potentially dangerous; and <br />b) The dog owner must provide a written behavioral assessment to the hearing officer. <br />The behavioral assessment shall be prepared by a licensed veterinarian or certified <br />animal professional and shall describe the dog's normal behaviors toward unknown <br />persons, and may include recommendations regarding the dangerous or potentially <br />dangerous dog determination, future care and training, and possible re-evaluation of <br />the dog. <br />6) Hearing procedure. <br />a) Any hearing must be held within fourteen (14) days of the appeal to determine the <br />validity of the dangerous dog declaration. The city shall mail written notice of the <br />hearing to the owner requesting the hearing to the address provided on the request and <br />to any person who was an alleged victim of the dog that is subject of the hearing. <br />b) The hearing officer shall be the City Administrator or an impartial person designated <br />by the City Administrator to conduct the hearing. "Impartial" means that the hearing <br />officer did not have any direct involvement in the original determination that the dog <br />is a dangerous dog or potentially dangerous dog <br />c) At the hearing, the parties shall have the opportunity to present evidence in the form <br />of exhibits and testimony. Each party may question the other party's witnesses. The <br />strict rules of evidence do not apply and the records of the animal control authority <br />are admissible without further foundation. <br />d) The Hearing Officer may add, remove, or modify all conditions deemed appropriate <br />by the Animal Control Authority for a potentially dangerous dog. In addition, the <br />hearing officer may reevaluate the status of the dog after a specified time period or <br />upon completion of any required dog training and may remove the potentially <br />dangerous dog designation at that time. <br />e) The Hearing Officer shall make written findings of fact and reach a written <br />conclusion as to whether the dog is a dangerous dog or potentially dangerous dog <br />pursuant to this chapter, within ten (10) days after the hearing. The decision must be <br />delivered to the dog's owners by hand delivery or registered mail as soon as practical <br />and a copy must be provided to the animal control authority. <br />f) The decision of the Hearing Officer is final without any further right of administrative <br />appeal. An aggrieved party may obtain review thereof by petitioning the Minnesota <br />Court of Appeals for a Writ of Certiorari not more than thirty (30) days after service <br />of the hearing officer's written decision. <br />Sec. 10-36 — Police Dogs <br />This chapter shall not apply to police dogs under the control of a licensed law enforcement <br />officer during the performance of official police activities. <br />10 <br />