|
PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
<br />CITY OF HUGO
<br />ORDINANCE NO. 2002-302 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
<br />N ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUGO, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA,
<br />rMENDING SECTION 1215 OF THE HUGO COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE REG-
<br />ULATIONS BY REQUIRING ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PROHIBITING )
<br />PREMATURE SUBDIVISIONS amsey )
<br />Section 1. The City Council of the City of Hugo does hereby amend Section 1215
<br />of the Hugo Comprehensive Land Use Regulations by adding the following:
<br />5.1
<br />UATE PUBLIC
<br />deemed to lack ck adequuate ppublic facilities pursuant l oScriteria, which preliminary nc uderthose final list- her, or the publisher's designated agent, being duly sworn, on
<br />ed below, may be denied by the City Council.
<br />g t I tat am the ublisher, or the publisher's designated agent and
<br />Subd. 1. Conditions Establishing
<br />Premature Subdivisions. A subdivision p r P g g
<br />may be deemed premature if it lacks adequate public facilities as defined below. The er known as White Bear Press, and that I haveP
<br />, of the newspaper following conditions shall not be an exclusive list of conditions. P
<br />(A) Lack of Adequate Drainage: A condition of inadequate drainage shall be
<br />deemed to exist if: lge Of the facts which are stated below:
<br />(1) Surface or subsurface water retention and runoff are such that it constitutes
<br />a danger to the structural security or risk of flooding of the proposed structures. irspaper has complied with all of the requirements Constituting
<br />(2). The proposed site grading and development will cause harmful and
<br />irreparable damage from erosion and siltation on downhill or downstream land. i as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute
<br />(3). Factors to be considered in making these determinations may include:
<br />average rainfall for the area; the relation of the land to flood plains; the nature of soils A07, and other applicable laws, as amended.
<br />and subsoils and their ability to adequately support surface water runoff and waste dis-
<br />posal systems; the slope of the land and its effect on effluents, and the presence of ited City of Hugo Ordinance No. 2002-362
<br />streams as related to effluent disposal.
<br />(B) Lack of Adequate Water Supply: A proposed subdivision shall be deemed
<br />to lack an adequate water supply if the proposed subdivision does not have adequate
<br />sources of water to serve the proposed subdivision if developed to its maximum per- tached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was
<br />missible density without causing an unreasonable depreciation of existing water sup-
<br />plies for surrounding areas. published once each week, for--- 1—successive weeks; it was
<br />(C) Lack of Adequate Roads or Highways to Serve the Subdivision: A proposed
<br />subdivision shall be deemed to lack adequate roads or highways to serve the subdivi- led On Wednesday , the 24 day Of
<br />sion when:
<br />(1) Roads which are needed to serve the proposed subdivision are of such a , 20-02_, and was thereafter printed and published on
<br />width, grade, stability, vertical and horizontal alignment, configuration, site distance and
<br />surface condition that an increase in traffic volume generated by the proposed subdivi- t0 and including ,
<br />sion would create a hazard to public safety and general welfare, or seriously aggravate
<br />an already hazardous condition, or when said roads are inadequate for the intended ✓ of , 20 ; and printed below is a copy
<br />use and the proposal does not include developer -supplied improvements adequate to
<br />the costs of upgrading those roads. r case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby
<br />The traffic volume generated by the proposed subdivision would create
<br />sonable road or highway congestion or unsafe conditions on roads or highways ;ed as being the size and kind of type used in the composition
<br />existing at the time of the application or proposed for completion within the next two (2)
<br />years. tion of the notice:
<br />(D) Lack of Adequate Waste Disposal Systems: A proposed subdivision shall
<br />be deemed to lack adequate waste disposal systems if in subdivisions for which sewer pqrstuvwxyz
<br />lines are proposed, there is inadequate sewer capacity in the present system to sup-
<br />port the subdivision if developed to its maximum permissible density after reasonable BY:
<br />sewer capacity is reserved for schools, planned public facilities, and commercial and
<br />industrial development projected for the next five (5) years; or if in subdivisions where
<br />sewer lines are neither available nor proposed, there is inadequate on-site sewer TITLE: Publisher
<br />capacity potential to support the subdivision if developed to the maximum permissible
<br />density indicated in any governing planning document or ordinance or amendments
<br />thereto. and sworn to before me on
<br />(E) Inconsistency With Comprehensive Plan: Subdivisions that do not follow
<br />planned public improvement corridors or that do not constitute an infilling of develop-
<br />ment shall be deemed inconsistent with the City's growth strategies as outlined in te _1y Of .Tli y 20Q�_. p1NES'��P
<br />Comprehensive Plan. j NEcp
<br />(F) City Service Capacity: A proposed subdivision shall be determined to lack(zG���\C MS N
<br />necessary City service capacity when services such as recreational facilities, police , sr j�11 .. _\`�7L7DE'
<br />and fire protection, and other City services, which must be provided at public expense, P .E
<br />cannot reasonably be provided for within the next two (2) years. "welro-neexpires
<br />\a(G) Inconsistency With Capital Improvement Plans: A proposed subdivision ic, ounty, Minn.
<br />shall be deemed inconsistent with capital improvement plans when improvementsand/or services necessary to accommodate the proposed subdivision have not beenMy January 31, 2005
<br />programmed in applicable capital improvement plans. The City Council may waive this
<br />criterion when it can be demonstrated that a revision to capital improvement programs
<br />can be accommodated.
<br />Subd. 2Burden of Establishing: The burden shall be upon the applicant to show that RATE INFORMATION
<br />the proposed subdivision or development has adequate public facilities and is not pre-
<br />mature. lassified rate paid by
<br />Section 2. Severability. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction adjudges
<br />any part of this Ordinance to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provi- ial users for Comparable
<br />sion of this Ordinance no specifically included within that judgment.
<br />Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect from and after its pas- $
<br />sage and publication according to law.
<br />PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hugo on the 15th day (Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />2002. 1 rate allowed by law for
<br />matter.
<br />Fran Miron, Mayor
<br />ATTEST:
<br />Mary Ann Creager, City Clerk
<br />Published in the White Bear Press July 24, 2002.
<br />tally charged for the
<br />Ater.
<br />(Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />$ 6-75/col, in( -h
<br />(Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />
|