|
PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
<br />AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
<br />CITY OF HUGO
<br />STATE OF MINNESOTA) §
<br />ORDINANCE 1999-332
<br />AMENDING CHAPTER 290
<br />County of Ramsey )
<br />AN ORDINANCE
<br />OF THE HUGO CITY CODE
<br />ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION" BY ALLOWING
<br />FOR PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF MAJOR
<br />I, the publisher, or the publisher's designated agent, being duly sworn,
<br />SUBDIVISIONS
<br />The City Council of the City of Hugo does
<br />on oath state that I am the publisher, or the publisher's designated
<br />hereby amend Chapter 290 of he Citi Code byt
<br />repealing the existing 21110-6, Subd.tied
<br />agent and an employee of the newspaper known as The White Bear
<br />"Staged Development" in its entirety, and
<br />replacing it with the following
<br />Press, and that I have full knowledge of the facts which are stated
<br />Subd. I. Phased Development of Maior
<br />Subdivisions.
<br />Phased development of major subdivisions
<br />below:
<br />may be allowed, without the necessity of
<br />(A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constitut-
<br />obtaining preliminary plat approval indepen-
<br />dently for successive phases, at the discretion
<br />but to the procedures and
<br />ing qualification as a ualificatilifiednewspaper,provided b Minnesota
<br />qualified as y
<br />of the City, subject
<br />conditions outlined herein.
<br />Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended.
<br />(1) Election. A written development agree-
<br />ment between the Developer and the City must
<br />(B) The Printed CITY OF HUGO
<br />describe the phasing plan for a development.
<br />an election
<br />OR7PTNANOR 1999-332
<br />In the development agreement,
<br />shall be made by the Developer. The Developer
<br />shall choose either to delegate to the City the
<br />determine if the provisions of
<br />which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and
<br />sole authority to
<br />this section have been complied with, or the
<br />was printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks;
<br />Developer shall choose not to use this section
<br />and shall proceed anew with any future phases
<br />WEDNESDAY
<br />it was first published on —'the 28 day of
<br />within the development.
<br />(2) Time Limit. Should the Developer
<br />APRIL 1999, and was thereafter printed and published on
<br />choose to avoid beginning anew, the original
<br />development agreement shall specify the maxi-
<br />,
<br />every to and including
<br />mum time allowed for the submission to the
<br />:y of an application for final plat approval of
<br />the day of 19 ; and printed below is a
<br />bsequent phases within a development. In
<br />no case will a Developer be allowed more than
<br />copy of the lower case alphabet from A t0 Z, both inclusive, which IS
<br />twenty-four (24) months to elapse between the
<br />the
<br />date of preliminary plat approval, on
<br />onorigi-
<br />hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the
<br />nal phase, and the date on which I cat
<br />made for final plat approval of any other phase
<br />composition and publication of the notice:
<br />within the development.
<br />(3) Review by City. Proposed final plats for
<br />each successive phase of an approved original
<br />the City for
<br />pat
<br />abedefghijklmnopgBtuvwxyz
<br />arycompli-
<br />plat shall be reviewed by
<br />ance with the approved original preliminary plat
<br />ance
<br />BY:
<br />and development agreement. If the submitted
<br />is in substantial
<br />plat for a successive phase
<br />compliance with the original approved prelimi-
<br />TITLE: Publisher
<br />nary plat and development agreement, it shall
<br />then be provided to the City Council for review
<br />for final plat approval. The decision as to
<br />is in "substantial
<br />Subscribed and sworn to before me on
<br />whether a successive phase
<br />compliance" shall be made solely by the City
<br />this-2.$_day of APRTT. ,19
<br />(according to the election made by the
<br />Developer). Any challenge of this decision,
<br />Board of
<br />MATRICE SCHAFRS
<br />beyond the City pouncil or
<br />Adjustments and App eals, shall operate an
<br />NOTARYPUBLIC- MINNESOTA
<br />election by the Developer to begin the plat
<br />MY Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2000
<br />approval process anew.
<br />(4) Resection of Phases. If the City deter-
<br />Notary u iC, am ,'i6�Ttlit'
<br />mines that an application for plat approval of
<br />subsequent phases is not substantially in com-
<br />original preliminary
<br />My commission expires January 31. 2000.
<br />pliance with the approved
<br />plator development agreement, the Zoning
<br />___________________________________________________________________
<br />Administrator shall reject the application. The
<br />submit an application for a
<br />RATE INFORMATION
<br />applicant may then
<br />major subdivision preliminary plat approval in
<br />conformance with the standards found for pre-
<br />within this Ordinance.
<br />(1) Lowest Classified rate paid by
<br />liminary plat approval
<br />Applications for amended preliminary plat
<br />commercial users for comparable $
<br />approval shall be subject to a public hearing
<br />requirement before the Planning Commission
<br />space. (Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />and administered in all other ways the same as
<br />for original preliminary plat
<br />$
<br />applications
<br />(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for
<br />approvals.
<br />(5) Developm�Aoreements. A new deyel-
<br />the above matter. (Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />opment agreement, for each successive phase
<br />be at the discretion of
<br />of a plat, may required
<br />the City.
<br />(3) Rate actuall char ed for the $ 6.00/INCH
<br />y g
<br />(6) Qhana� eh_ � ---Laws. Regulatory changes
<br />development of land which
<br />above matter. (Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />affecting the use or
<br />occur between the time of the oration
<br />friginal or
<br />plat approval and the app'
<br />of subsequent phases shall apply
<br />plan approval
<br />to the subsequent phases unless specifically
<br />addressed within the original development
<br />changes may be
<br />agreement. The regulatory
<br />addressed within the subsequent phases
<br />through the use of a development agreement
<br />need for beginning the
<br />without triggering a
<br />major subdivision process anew.
<br />(7) Effective Date. This ordinance shall
<br />become effective from and after its adoption
<br />and publication.
<br />Upon roll call, members voting AYE:
<br />Barnes, Haas, Leroux, Petryk, Stoltzman.
<br />Voting NAY: NONE
<br />ordinance was declared
<br />Where upon said
<br />passed and adopted this 19th day of April,
<br />1999.
<br />Wally Stoltzman, Mayor
<br />ATTEST:
<br />Mary Ann Creager, City Clerk
<br />Published in the White Bear Press April 28,
<br />1999.
<br />
|