Laserfiche WebLink
City Council meeting of October 7, 1991 <br />Paqe 2 <br />added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the resolution <br />until December, 1991. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be <br />added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of any <br />properties so assessed may at any time, prior to certification of the <br />assessments to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such <br />property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City <br />Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire <br />assessment is paid within 30 days from the date of adoption of this <br />resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer, <br />the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest <br />accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such <br />payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged <br />through December 31 of the next succeeding year. The proposed assessment <br />roll has been on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. <br />The total amount of the proposed assessment is $265,753.45. Written or <br />oral objections will be considered at the meeting this evening. No appeal <br />may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written <br />objection is filed with the Clerk:: prior to the hearing or presented to the <br />presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may upon such notice <br />consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment <br />at an adjourned meeting. Any property owner may appeal an assessment to <br />the district court pursuant to M.S. 429.081 by serving notice of the <br />appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City Within 30 days after the <br />adoption of the assessment, and filing such notice with the district court <br />within 10 days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk:. The appropriate <br />legal notices were forwarded to each property owner of record pursuant to <br />Minnesota Statutes. The staff is recommending adoption of the assessment <br />roll as identified with the enclosed resolution. The City staff <br />recommends that any formal appeals to the assessments for approval Monday <br />evening, as well as specifics of the appeal be reviewed by the City <br />Council and acted on by the City Council at their October 21, 1991 <br />meeting. <br />Letters of appeal, and requests to check:: assessment calculations, were <br />submitted by John Waller (93027-2865), Greg Gressen (93150-2000), Tom <br />Drewry (93034-2330), J im LeMoine (93176-2000), Dan Santanni (930753-2100), <br />and k::eystone Builders (93165-2000, 2:75, 2600, 2625), and Councilman Miron <br />requested that the assessment for Lorraine St. Sau-ver (93700-2125) be <br />reviewed. These tax parcels, as listed, shall be deleted from the <br />assessment roll resolution, and tabled to the Council meeting on <br />lo/21/91. Several other residents had questions regarding culverts, <br />driveway locations, and City policy on corner lots. <br />"Bron made motion, Stoltzman seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION 1991-18, <br />RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE ?. <br />VOTING AYE: Brunotte, Jesinski, Miron, Stoltzman <br />VOTING NAY: None <br />Motion Carried. <br />PARk:. USE POLICY <br />City Administrator Huber reviewed the status of this matter tabled from an <br />earlier Council meeting, and he will be requesting copies of park:: -Use <br />policies from other cities. <br />