1990.01.02 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council. meeting of January �', 1990 -age 7 3. Any driveway permits requiring access to Highways or county roads may not be issued until. the necessary permits are s( -cured from Washington County MNDOT . 9. Percolation tests for each buildable site must be submitted to the City prior to final survey approval. 10. Payment of fee in lieu of par[. -.land dedication shall be paid to the City ($175.00). 11. This approval shall be granted with the understanding that said subdivision does not create any landlocked parcels by the petitioner and land owner. 12. No improvements, landscaping, or gradinq shall be permitted in the defined drainage areas without the express written authorization of the City and the approved watershed districts. 13. All property owners shall be responsible for maintenance of drainage areas within easements on their property. 14. Developer shall comply with all requirements and restrictions applicable to identified wetlands. 15. Legal descriptions of all parcels to be subdivided should be included. 16. The developer shall permit access to the referenced site for periodic inspection to assure conformance with the subdivision. All aye. Motion Carried. REVIEW FISCAL POLICY rhe City Council received a copy of the current fiscal policy for the City of Hugo as adopted by the City Council (Resolution 1987-65). Members of the City Council have suggested it might be appropriate to review the City's current fiscal policy for possible modification. The City's finance director will prepare a summary of the City's financial situation as it relates to dedicated and undedicated cash balance. BESA PERMIT INTERPRETATION Recently, the officers of the Bald Eagle Sportsman Association have contacted the City with regard to an interpretation of their Special Use Permit as it relates to the second sentence in Item #15 of the permit. The interpretation being requested involves the intent of the permit with regard to use of the facility by youth groups, firearm safety programs, law enforcement agencies, and the civilian marksmanship program. Was it the intent of the City to require that one out of every four people in the above mentioned groups be a member of the BESA'? If it was not intent of the City to make this a requirement of the above referenced groups, the Association is requesting a letter from the City clarifying this issue. If it was the intent of the City to require that one out of every four - members present of the group in question be a member of the BESA, then the Association is requesting a modification in the permit to reflect xempting these groups from the provisions of the second sentence in Item 415 of the permit. It was the consensus of the City Council that Item •gas intended to require that one out of every four people present on days ether than Saturday and Sundry, be a member of the BESA. Should the BESA like a modification in Item ##f15, a specific request should be S:ubm.i.tted t(n the City CGllnCil i.n writi.nq.