Laserfiche WebLink
City Council meeting of February 5, 1990 <br />Page 6 <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />The City received a LETTER OF INTENT from <br />improvements to Elmcrest Avenue from Bald <br />limits. There are no written comments fir <br />Johnson has not had ample time to review. <br />problems with the document as long as it <br />engineering costs will be shared for that <br />Eaqle Latae to County Road 14 only. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - EXTENSION <br />the City of Lino Lakes regardinc_ <br />Eagle Lake to the north City <br />om the City Attorney as Mr. <br />The City Council had no <br />was made clear to Lino Lakes that <br />portion of Elmcrest from Bald <br />McAllister made motion, Olson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION 1190-5 <br />RESOLUTION REQUESTING TIME EXTENSION FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S <br />COMPREHENSIVE FLAN AND AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF SAME. <br />VOTING AYE: McAllister, Jesink:si, Olson, Vail <br />VOTING NAY: NONE <br />Motion Carried. <br />City Administrator, Ken Huber, reported that the City is no longer in the <br />business of issuing well permits. This responsibility may soon be taken <br />over by Washington County. <br />Administrator Huber reported on pending rezonings being considered by Linc <br />Lakes for property adjacent to Hugo on Elmcrest Avenue. Because the City <br />received insufficient information, no comment was made. <br />Administrator Huber reported on a request from a private developer who is <br />interested in industrial development revenue bonds. The Council was not <br />opposed to the idea, but would litre to have some type of proposal <br />submitted to them once all the needed information is available. <br />The Council reviewed an article from the Forest Lake Times regarding_ <br />"Hugo's commitment to the recycling program of the Boy Scout Troop" <br />operating at 170th Street and Highway 61. Councilman McAllister asked <br />that Roger Schadt be contacted asking him to clearly identify what has <br />been denied them by the City Council. It was McAllister's feeling that <br />the Council had been accommodating in all their requests. <br />Realtor Paul Tubbs appeared before the City Council questioning an <br />interpretation made by City staff regarding his client's request for a <br />building permit. The lot in question was "grandfathered in" with a lot <br />width of 185' in front and 60C)'+ at the rear. Mr. Tubbs was informed that <br />a building permit was denied for where his clients wanted to build their <br />house because they could meet the 3-00' requirement at the buildinq set.b.:::(-k: <br />line. They were given three options: 1) appeal the Zoning <br />Administrator's interpretation of the City Code, C) apply for a variance, <br />or } construct the house where the site has at least 300' of lot. width. <br />Options 1. and �. a.ould be heard by the Board of Zoning Adjustments and <br />Appeals. <br />