1989.05.01 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council meeting of 5/1/89 Page 3 L. The property lines on site must be identified by the applicants to assure proper setbacks when buildings are to be constructed if required by the building inspector. .3. Proposed driveways or drainage areas within the development must include installation of a minimum 15" diameter corrugated metal culvert in a manner acceptable to the City. 4. No building permits shall be issued until the survey has been approved and recorded with Washington County. 5. All fees relating to this subdivision shall be paid by the applicant including the cost of recording documents with Washington County. b. Dedication of required parkland, or payment of fee in lieu of parkland dedication, shall be paid to the City prior to final survey approval. 7. No improvements, landscaping, or grading shall be permitted in the defined drainage areas without the express written authorization of the City and the approved watershed districts. 8. Developer shall comply with all requirements and restrictions applicable to identified wetlands. 9. The developer shall permit access to the referenced site for periodic inspections to assure conformance with the subdivision. All aye. Motion Carried. M I NC(R SUED _REEOUEST t WLASCH 1 N j Ray and Ramona Wla=_.chin have made application to the City of Hugo for a minor subdivision of approximately 16 acres into two parcels, one containing approximately 9 acres and the other approximately 7.6 acres. The property in question is zoned RRy requiring a 5 acre minimum lot size. A certificate of survey has been prepared in compliance with city subdivision regulations and the site in question is not subject to Rice Creek: Watershed District review. Although Tract B has only 220' of frontage on County Rd. 8, the lot meets the lot width requirements based on the 300' width at the building setback line. Note the house is proposed at the south end of the lot. Both tracts A and B have frontage on County Rd. 8, and appear to meet all city requirements as proposed. This matter was reviewed before the Hugo Planning Commission at their April Lb, 1969 meeting, at which time said Commission unanimously recommended approval of this minor subdivision and waiver of the formal platting requirements. McAllister (made motion, J'esinsk:) seconded, to approve final Certificate of Survey #t5 -1-99(B) for Ray and Ramona Wlanchin, waiver- of the formal platting procedure, for the following described property: Part of the W 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SIJ 1/4 of Section T~, T31N, R21W, Parcel No. 93036-2530 Washington County, Minnesota. ;approval is subject to the following special conditions: 1. All conditions must be complied i.ed !>,.-i.th within 30 days of sur_..s,e..y acceptance or t_his approval shall be null and void. 2. All conditions of survey approval iic'be met prior to the stamping it c`.<.ny deeds for recording by t:.ht:: city clerk: unless otherwise is erf'Ci.it:'.t:e(I 3. The by Council action..i lines on site I?iust be identified by i_}...te appl:l.tm:_tl.....{s .,..o assure proper setbacks when bLl1..I.dings are to be constructed if required by t'.P;e l:r•._!.ildi.ng inspector.