1989.06.05 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council meeting of June 5, 1989 Page 5 for Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 of the proposed subdivision. This tabled request was reviewed again by the Hugo Planning Commission at their meeting of May 24, 1989, at which time said Commission unanimously recommended denial of the preliminary plat based on the following reasons: 1. Potentially hazardous intersection proposed at the east end of Lot 1, Block 1. The intersection in question was not corrected as per Planning Commission request. 2. All three lake lots are under the 300' lot width requirement at the building setback line. 3. The proposed drainage plan appears to drain the water off the property at a rate faster than currently exists. If the City Council follows the course of the planning Commission's recommendation, City staff recommends that the Council be very specific with regard to the reasons for denial of this plat as it relates to the City's subdivision requirements and development plan for the City. Administrator Huber reviewed the preliminary plat with the Council and the proposed changes made in the plat at a meeting held with the city engineer on 6/5/89' The applicants stated that they concurred with the staff recommendations for the plat. Councilman Olson stated that he had previously walked the property in question, and was opposed to the subdivision because of the wetlands located on the property, and the need for large variances in width for two lots located on the lake. Atkinson made motion, Vail seconded, to approve the preliminary plat for Jeanette Pfurtscheller and William Simonet, Jr., for the subdivision of 36.9 acres into seven lots to known as ROUND LAKE ADDITION. The property is generally described as the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 35, T31N, R21W, and that part of Government Lot 1, Section 35, T31N, R21W, lying east shore of Round Lake. Approval is subject to the following special conditions: 1' The final plat must be submitted to the City Council within 90 days of preliminary survey acceptance or approval shall be null and void. 2' The property lines on site must be identified by the applicants to assure proper setbacks when buildings are to be constructed if required by the building inspector. 3. Proposed driveways or drainage areas within the development must include installation of a minimum 15" diameter corrugated metal culvert in a manner acceptable to the City if required. 4. No building permits shall be issued until the plat has been approved and recorded with Washington County. 5' Submittal of a separate drainage plan and securing of the required permits from the watershed district, Department of Natural Resources, and Army Corps of Engineers as required prior to final plat approval. 6. All fees relating to this subdivision shall be paid by the applicant including the cost of recording documentswith Washington County. 7. Percolation tests for each buildable site must be submitted to the City prior to final survey or plat approval. G. Payment of fee in lieu of parkland dedication shall be made to the City prior to final plat approval.