Laserfiche WebLink
City Council meeting of 3/7/88 <br />for granted and assume Hugo residents are familiar with. Some of the most <br />common questions that are raised involve office hours, meeting dates, <br />required permits, home occupations, when horses are permitted on site, doq <br />kennels, burning permits, animal control, requests for law enforcement <br />services, tax information, proposed development and road improvements, and <br />others. We feel that an annual City Hall newsletter would be most helpful <br />not only in making Hugo residents aware of what is going on in the <br />community, but to save the staff considerable time in fielding these <br />questions in the future. The staff has indicated a willingness to <br />assemble the newsletter with the pertinent information and take it to a <br />professional printer for layout and printing. I would estimate the cost, <br />not counting labor, at $1200 to $1500. <br />Atkinson made motion, Olson seconded, that the City Council authorize the <br />staff to proceed with the layout and distribution of a city newsletter in <br />an amount not to exceed $1,500.00. <br />VOTING AYE: Peltier, Olson, Vail, Atkinson <br />VOTING NAY: Potts <br />Motion Carried. <br />MISCELLANEOUS <br />Atkinson made motion, Peltier seconded, allowing the Mayor to sign the <br />interrogatories as prepared by the city attorney, on behalf of the city, <br />relative to the White Dear Rod & Gun Club litigation, and proceed with use <br />of the noise consultant as recommended by the city attorney. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />POTTS vs. CITY OF HUGO <br />Potts made motion, Olson seconded, that the city send a letter to Gene <br />Sampson and others regarding the court's decision on parking of <br />semi -tractors and trailers in residential zones, and ordering removal of <br />said vehicles. <br />Because the Supreme Court's decision to not consider the city's appeal of <br />this litigation was so recent, Mayor Atkinson and Attorney Charles Johnson <br />suggested that this matter be tabled for further consideration. <br />Councilman Olson withdrew his second to the motion and motion died for <br />lack: of a second. <br />JEANETTE PFURTSCHELLER vs CITY OF HUGO ET AL <br />Atkinson made motion, Vail seconded, <br />be directed to represent the City of <br />Pfurtscheller vs City of Hugo et al. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />that city attorney, Charles Johnson, <br />Hugo in the matter of Jeannette <br />